advertisement
On ZDNet: 5 ways to prevent IT failure
Find Articles in:
all
Business
Reference
Technology
News
Sports
Health
Autos
Arts
Home & Garden
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with
Thomson / Gale

Nine lessons the auto industry can learn from the 787 Dreamliner: when the company's survival is on the line you can do what you've done better, or do something different. Boeing chose different

Automotive Design & Production,  Dec, 2006  by Christopher A. Sawyer

The 787 wasn't the first shot Boeing took at resurrecting its commercial airliner business in the dark days of the late 1990s. The first was the near-Mach Sonic Cruiser, a 21st Century plane that promised faster travel for the average flier. Its main problem was that it wasn't the efficient, comfortable, special airplane the airlines and flying public wanted. Enter the 787: "The Sonic Cruiser and 787 took aim at the same spot in the market--mid-size [200-250 passengers] and long range [7,000-8,000 nautical miles]--but there is greater value for a majority of airlines in creating a more fuel efficient jetliner than a faster one," says Tom Cogan, 787 chief program engineer. However, fuel efficiency alone isn't enough to bring passengers and--more importantly--airlines to your door. New Ford CEO Alan Mullaly, the president and CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes at the time of the plane's inception, said the Dreamliner had to "provide new solutions for airlines and passengers" and "bring back the magic of flight."

Most Popular Articles in Autos
Service Slants
2007 utility vehicle buyer's guide: Side-By-Sides are popular; here's who ...
Transmission considerations: beyond the manual gearbox
Buell Motorcycle engineering, innovation, & dedication: in an industry ...
100 + 10: America's oldest automotive magazine celebrates its 110th year ...
More »
advertisement

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Auto Lesson #1:

Fuel efficiency may be important, but you can't lose sight of the fact that cars and trucks have a certain "magic" associated with them for many people.

For the 787, this meant addressing the main complaint of any flyer: the cabin. While First and Business Class accommodations are often roomier and more comfortable, Coach Class seats usually qualify for the term "steerage." But better seats and more elbow room only go so far. How people interact with the space is as important as how much space they have to interact with. "The initial goals included an unprecedented focus on the passenger experience, in much the same way a company like BMW focuses on the driver," says Blake Emery, director, Differentiation Strategy, Boeing Commercial Airplanes. That focus, he says, had to include "an experience noticeably different than anything that has gone before, and that included focusing on the unique experience of being thousands of feet above the earth."

Auto Lesson #2:

Focus on what the drivers and passengers will do, how being in a vehicle makes their journey unique, and how to use this information to make those trips enjoyable.

Emery says he draws inspiration from a number of sources, including automotive interiors, and is good friends with Ital Design's Fabrizio Giugiaro and Fiat's Michael Robinson. However, he saw no need to throw out established relationships to create the interior for what many analysts were calling Boeing's "make-or-break" airplane. Teague Design of Seattle, Washington (www.teague.com)--an award-winning industrial design firm founded in 1926 by noted designer Walter Dorwin Teague that has a 60-year relationship with Boeing--was called in to work with Emery's design team. Faced with a machine drawn from a clean slate and using state-of-the-art materials and construction techniques, the group decided to throw all their assumptions out the window and start from scratch. In effect, they decided to re-connect with the flying public, and determine their true needs and desires.

Auto Lesson #3:

Sometimes the tried-and-true limits your ability to breakout.

"We conducted a lot of research in cities throughout the world, including Tokyo, Munich, London, Hong Kong, as well as several cities in North America," says Emery, "and from this we wrote a brief that drove the design effort." That brief included two important facts: (1) people are fascinated with flight and want to feel connected to the experience as it happens, and (2) they like to feel welcomed when they enter a new place. "Space is at a premium in an airplane," says Emery, "so the major challenge any interior design team faces is how to make passengers more comfortable while still providing a product that allows airlines to be more profitable." And those airlines loathe stepping outside known boundaries. As a result, seats are selected from various known suppliers, and installed by Boeing according to the carrier's specifications for leg room, room between seats, backrest angle, etc. Leaving this relationship unchanged, however, could have scuttled the designers' plans before takeoff. Says Emery, "With the 787 we took some initiative."

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Auto Lesson #4:

Go back to first principles and re-learn what you already "know."

Boeing sent its designers and engineers into the field to study the available seats in order to determine which worked best with their plans for the 787. It didn't take long, however, before they determined why some seat designs are more comfortable than others, and what items would improve available leg room. "From this," says Emery, "we put together a seat rating system based on comfort and how the design accentuated leg room for the person in the row behind." These standards were turned into a rating system that gave the airlines objective data they could use during seat selection. No supplier was told their seat would not be listed, but they were informed that the rating system would be applied. Not unexpectedly, says Emery, "virtually all of the seat makers put additional thought into their designs, and many have developed new options in order to get top scores within the Boeing rating system."