Auto Industry
Industry: Email Alert RSS FeedCalculating the formula
Automotive Design & Production, Feb, 2005
"The amount spent on catering in the paddock today is greater than the budget for the entire grid in the 1970s," quips Max Mosley, when asked about the cost of Formula One racing. Mosley is head of the Federation Internationale de I'Automobile (FIA), the governing body of racing. While teams are unwilling to divulge how much they spend each season, it's rumored that Ferrari has a $440 million annual budget for its championship-winning team, and Minardi spends about $60 million per year--just to qualify at the back of the grid.
Most RecentAuto Articles
- China Builds More Cars Than North America This Year and Next
- At Year's End, Volvo's Prospects Look Better Than Saab's
- Awash in Common Stock, Ford Motor Issues More Shares to UAW-Run Healthcare Trust
- Cars, Computers Converge as GM Gets CFO from Microsoft
- GM's New CFO is an Outsider (from Microsoft)
- More »
Because of these astronomical costs (and increasing track speeds) Mosley has pushed through new engine regulations that replace the current 3.0-liter V10s with 2.4-liter V8s. But this was not the only option on the table. "We looked at replacing the current formula with one that replaced gasoline with diesel fuel," he says, "but dropped the idea when we realized the engines wouldn't rev very high and would sound ridiculous." Direct injection was banned by regulating the in-cylinder pressure for the simple reason that "when this technology is developed for race engines that turn 19,000 rpm it is totally different from the technology developed for road cars." As a result, the FIA has specified the materials, technologies, and lifespan for the 2006 engine, but stopped short of instituting a common engine control unit or mandating alternative fuels and technologies.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
The FIA's investigations into these areas continue, but are far from bearing fruit. "Bio fuels are coming in 2008, but we have dropped our investigation into energy recovery systems for the time being." Mosley says the technology not only would increase the gulf between the wealthy and poor teams, there is no fail-safe way to contain the stored energy in case of an accident. "It's a fascinating area of research," he says, "but it is unworkable at this point."--CAS
Brought to you by CBS MoneyWatch.com
- Best- and Worst-Paid College Degrees
- 6 Things You Should Never Do on Twitter or Facebook
- How Much Sleep Do You Really Need?
- 6 Big Myths about Gas Mileage
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Autos Articles
Most Recent Autos Publications
Most Popular Autos Articles
- Nitto launches winter tire distributed by ATD.(News)
- TRANSFER CASE STUDIES: DIAGNOSING GM's 4WD SYSTEM
- Pep Boys Now Sells Auto Parts and Accessories Online
- FUEL TRIM(MING) DIAGNOSTIC TIME
- Unibody vs. body-on-frame - sport-utility frames - includes related articles on low-cost sport utility vehicles and frame styles


