Government Industry
Safety Board Issues Recommendation on GE RJ Engine
Air Safety Week, March 24, 2008
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has issued recommendations to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) designed to address a safety concern raised by two engine failures on Bombardier Canadair Regional Jet CRJ-200 aircraft.
A flaw during the manufacturing process for fan blades led to the two engine failures, and the Safety Board wants procedures set up to remove these blades before another incident occurs. A companion recommendation was sent to the Canadian government.
- Most Popular Articles in Business
- Research and Markets : Tesco Plc - SWOT Framework Analysis
- Do Us a Flavor - Ben & Jerry's Issues a Call for Euphoric New Flavors
- eBay made easy: ready to start an eBay business? These 5 simple steps will ...
- Katrina's lawsuit surge: a legal battle to force insurers to pay for flood ...
- Wal-Mart's newest distribution center opened last month near the southwest ...
- More »
In both instances - a July 27, 2006 engine failure on an Air Nostrum CRJ shortly after takeoff from Barcelona, Spain, and a May 24, 2007 engine failure on an Atlantic Southeast airlines CRJ while in cruise flight from Syracuse to Atlanta - a fan blade on a General Electric CF34-3B1 turbofan engine fractured, causing a loud bang, severe vibration and in one case an engine fire. Both flight crews declared emergencies and landed safely with no injuries.
Examination of the blades showed that they failed due to a material defect introduced during the manufacturing process. The fan blades were manufactured by Teleflex Aerospace Manufacturing Group, located in Mexico. Teleflex has manufactured more than 28,000 of these blades.
"We are issuing this recommendation because we consider the safety risk associated with this condition to be unacceptably high," NTSB Chairman Mark V. Rosenker said.
The ASA fan blade failed after 4,717 cycles and 5,845 hours, which is very early in a blade's service life, the Board said.
The Board issued six recommendations to the FAA, including that it require GE Aviation to define a reasonable maximum time frame below 4,717 cycles since new for these Teleflex fan blades and require that the blades be removed from service before that limit is exceeded, to require GE to include additional testing in the manufacturing process for those blades, and to require GE to make modifications in its CF34-1/-3 engine design to ensure that high engine vibrations (such as can happen when a fan blade fractures) will not cause the engine to catch fire.
The Safety Board recommended that Transport Canada require Bombardier to redesign the retention feature of the CRJ 100/-200 engine throttle gearbox to ensure that it can withstand the loads generated by a fan blade separation or similar event.
[Copyright 2006 Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved.]
COPYRIGHT 2008 Access Intelligence, LLC
COPYRIGHT 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning