Government Industry
Industry: Email Alert RSS FeedBe Shaken, But Not Stirred
Air Safety Week, Feb 21, 2005
Always seeking to prove that there's not a lot new under the sun, we turned up another example of the Kenya Airways A310's fatal stick-shaker syndrome off Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire (ASW, Feb. 7). As you will see, it too was not to be a happy ending. An L-1011 Lockheed Tristar (registration N11002) on July 30, 1992, departed New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport as TWA843. The airplane was written off but the 292 souls on board survived. Checking the bits that poke out from the fuselage (and that can get bent) creates flight-worthy karma and airworthiness kismet.
Most RecentGovernment Articles
The saga: Flight 843's takeoff was commenced at 17:40 hours. Rotate speed was reached at 17:41:03 and the aircraft lifted off the runway. At that moment the stick-shaker activated and the first officer, who was making the takeoff, sensed a loss of performance. The captain then took over control and, although airborne, aborted the takeoff. The TriStar touched down again (at a vertical descent rate of 14 feet/second -- the structural design limit being 6 feet/sec) after being airborne for about six seconds. Maximum braking and reverse thrust were applied but the airplane didn't decelerate as expected. When it became apparent that he would not be able to stop before hitting the blast fence at the end of the runway, the captain turned the plane left off the runway onto a field. The TriStar came to rest 296 feet to the left of the runway and caught fire.
It appeared that the right-hand Angle of Attack (AOA) sensor had experienced nine previous malfunctions. The intermittent malfunction was not detectable during pre-flight system tests by the pilots and didn't trigger a fault light. This permitted the sensor to cause a false warning when the airground sensor on the landing gear went into the air status on takeoff.
NTSB Calls It
"Design deficiencies in the stall warning system that permitted a defect to go undetected, the failure of TWA's maintenance system and inadequate crew coordination between the captain and first officer ... resulted in their inappropriate response to a false stall warning."
[Copyright 2005 Access Intelligence, LLC. All rights reserved.]
Brought to you by CBS MoneyWatch.com
- Best- and Worst-Paid College Degrees
- 6 Things You Should Never Do on Twitter or Facebook
- How Much Sleep Do You Really Need?
- 6 Big Myths about Gas Mileage
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article


