Faith and Politics: How the "Moral Values" Debate Divides America and How to Move Forward Together
Christian Century, Jan 9, 2007 by Michael G. Long
Faith and Politics: How the 'Moral Values' Debate Divides America and How to Move Forward Together. By John Danforth. Viking, 224 pp., $24.95.
THIS IS NOT a ghostwritten book signed by yet another famous politician hoping to cash in after years of public service. Nor is it a typical political autobiography with incendiary comments about the opposition, a self-serving profile of courage, and a surefire recipe for returning the United States to greatness.
The real author of Faith and Politics is John Danforth, a former U.S. senator (R., Mo.) and an ordained Episcopal priest, and his short book is one of the most self-effacing and thoughtful essays on Christianity and polities to appear in recent years.
A major part of Danforth's project is to inspire Christians to move beyond the Manichaean politics practiced by the Christian right and the Christian left--a polities that defines a so-called Christian political agenda, pits the faithful against the infidels, and treats Christians primarily as voters.
Jim Wallis has already taken up a similar challenge, but Danforth quickly informs us that he is no Wallis and that he will not identify "God's polities" with a liberal or conservative political agenda. Why? "In sum, the creation of apolitical agenda is the work of some Christians, but it was not the work of Christ." No matter what this Age of Certainty may tell us, there is no set of rules for Christians to follow when staking out specific policy positions.
This claim will shock and perhaps anger some Christian pacifists, antiabortion activists and others who believe that their faith consists of moral absolutes that should be enshrined in public policy. But the reticent Danforth is right: Christian scriptures and the life of Jesus offer no specific policy directives for governments to adopt and practice.
All that our Christian faith leaves us with, Danforth writes, is "an approach, a way of thinking about and engaging in polities, that while not issue specific, is highly relevant to our ability to live together as one nation, despite our strongly held differences."
This approach embraces humility, recognizing that our politics can never fully encapsulate God's; it seeks reconciliation within the body politic, focusing less on wedge issues that drive us apart (like the ease of Terri Sehiavo) and more on common-ground issues (like realistic peacemaking initiatives in Sudan).
Unfortunately, Danforth is much better at criticizing the self-righteousness of political absolutists than he is at defining his Christian approach to polities.
On a practical level, his common-ground approach sacrifices major issues on the high altar of national unity. One would think, after all, that the war in Iraq would deserve special mention in a discussion of reconciliation in contemporary U.S. politics, but the ongoing conflagration barely makes an appearance in Faith and Politics.
On a theological level, the goal of Danforth's Christian politics--the unity of our political society--is also deeply troubling. To suggest a bit of internal criticism: preserving our body politic may be the work of some Christians, but it was not the work of Christ.
Christian scriptures certainly encourage us to practice "a ministry of reconciliation," but nowhere do we find support for using our faith to prop up a particular body politic--any body politic. The Christian practice of reconciliation is for the benefit of the world, not merely U.S. political society, and experience has taught us that not all bodies politic, especially not ours, have served the cause of global reconciliation.
Despite his insightful reflections on political humility, Danforth preaches a truly American gospel; this is a classic case of U.S. patriotism trumping Christian faith. The unintended result, of course, is that the world will continue to be as divided as ever.
Reviewed by Michael G. Long, assistant professor of religious studies at Elizabethtown College in Pennsylvania.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Reference Articles
Most Recent Reference Publications
Most Popular Reference Articles
- 9 questions to ask your new lover: what you were afraid to ask, but always wanted to know
- A world without nuclear weapons?
- How Tyler Perry rose from homelessness to a $5 million mansion
- Rejoice anyway - Zephaniah 3:14-20, Philippians 4:4-7 - Living by the Word - Column
- Medical education's dirtiest secret - use of medical residents



