Photographers As NATURALISTS
Natural History, Dec, 2000
Before the invention of photography in 1839, explorers such as Alexander von Humboldt and Captain James Cook brought watercolor artists along with them to document the world's plants and animals. By the mid-nineteenth century, however, a world without photographs was quickly becoming unimaginable, and every scientific expedition was accompanied by at least one photographer.
True, many of the early photographers' "wildlife" pictures were of explorers posing with the animals they had just shot. But some of these hardy souls became hooked on photographing living animals in the wild, whatever the effort or risk involved in capturing the images. A. R. Dugmore, an exemplary pioneer, once stood his ground against a charging rhinoceros while clutching a massive twenty-pound reflex camera. (Roll film was invented only in the 1880s, flashbulbs in the 1930s, and lightweight telephoto lenses and electronic cameras during the past few decades.)
- Most Popular Articles in Reference
- The importance of understanding organizational culture
- Credit card attitudes and behaviors of college students
- What factors attract foreign direct investment?
- Libraries Need Relationship Marketing - mutual interest marketing concept, ...
- How to set performance goals: employee reviews are more than annual critiques
- More »
Carl Akeley, best remembered for creating the Museum's Hall of African Mammals, was one of the great explorer-naturalists whose photographs appeared regularly in the pages of Natural History seventy-five years ago. Akeley made the first motion pictures of gorillas in their native forests and invented a special panoramic camera for field photography. During the 1920s and 1930s, the stylish husband-and-wife team of Martin and Osa Johnson also made wildlife movies in Africa and shot stills of rarely seen creatures for this magazine.
Right from the start, photographs were popularly believed to be more objective than sketches and paintings, since they seemed to be produced solely by light and chemicals rather than the human hand and eye. Although photographs were widely taken for reflections of reality, not a few photographers found they could build successful careers by using ingenious tricks to manipulate their images. Some simply moved a stone or log to get a better view of a flock of flamingos, while others tethered snakes and mongooses together, hoping to stage a dramatic-looking death match. Just a few years ago, a photographer stirred controversy by using a computer to add a few dozen zebras to a herd. But is fakery the important issue in these cases, or do photographers, like other visual artists, have a right to please their aesthetic sense by taking advantage of new tools?
Perhaps the most problematic aspect of contemporary nature photography is what is not in the frame. Are there telephone poles just beyond the loping giraffes in the photograph? Does a town or farm lie behind the foraging gorillas? Commercial images of wild animals and displays such as the Museum's dioramas tend to depict a timeless Eden, where humans are literally out of the picture.
Over the past half century, a growing sense of urgency about documenting the world's most threatened ecosystems before they are gone has energized a new breed of dedicated wildlife photographer. Some work primarily as artists, others as scientists, and a few as both, with a bit of the journalist and environmental partisan thrown in. Perhaps their greatest influence came from the resurgence of field biology in the twentieth century.
Documenting the natural behavior of animals, however, requires more than scientific knowledge and technical skill. One also has to be ready to spend thousands of hours trekking, setting up, and sitting patiently day after day in heat, cold, snow, or rain -- prolonged self-abnegation that must be based on a deep love of the wilderness and its creatures.
COPYRIGHT 2000 Natural History Magazine, Inc.
COPYRIGHT 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning