Critics recommend alternative funerals
National Catholic Reporter, Jan 30, 1998 by Leslie Wirpsa
Exposes of unethical practices in the funeral industry and critiques of the commercialization of the rites surrounding death have, in recent years, prompted campaigns for more careful regulation of the business and for alternatives in death care.
From the dissemination of wholesale casket prices on the Internet to the publication of a guide on how families can take on many of the tasks of preparing loved ones for burial, initiatives are spreading nationwide to offer consumers choices at the time of their bereavement.
On the consumer advocacy front, the Arizona-based Interfaith Funeral Information Committee provides extensive tools through its Web page (www.xroads. com/~funerals) and hotline to help consumers shop for a funeral and detect questionable marketing tactics.
"This is really a scummy business," said Fr. Henry Wasielewski, who heads the IFIC and has tracked the funeral business for 15 years. "Fifteen years earlier, as a priest, I didn't know I was sending people to some of the worst criminal mortuaries there were."
Wasielewski has ardently campaigned to keep consumers informed about reasonable funeral prices through the committee and in cooperation with memorial societies to conduct surveys exposing high priced establishments (See NCR Feb. 21, 1997 and Sept. 13, 1996).
The recently released Profits of Death: An Insider Exposes the Death Care Industries by Darryl J. Roberts, (Five Star Publications, Chandler, ARiz.) provides a detailed account of just what happens surrounding death -- under the skin of the body, behind closed doors at the funeral parlor and among lobbyists in the halls of Congress. Informed by his life in the industry and motivated by a desire to give something back to the consumers who provided him with a comfortable living, Roberts' account is an essential field guide.
"I know from experience that the funeral and cemetery operations -- the death merchants, if you will -- are a potent marketing and political force. They have over the years succeeded in creating an exclusionary business atmosphere in which they strictly limit competition and control pricing," Roberts writes in the prologue.
Service Corporation International, the largest corporate funeral chain, has filed a defamation suit against Roberts and his publishers for allegedly quoting falsely SCI chair and CEO Robert L. Waltrip, causing the company and the executive "shame, embarrassment, humiliation, mental pain and anguish."
Local memorial societies, which first formed in the United States in the 1930s, growing from agricultural burial cooperatives, provide a workable way for consumers to manage funeral arrangements. By twinning with a handful of reasonably priced mortuaries in their area, the funeral and memorial societies assure members services by striking group price agreements with the funeral directors.
Grouped today under the umbrella of the Funeral and Memorial Societies of America, these organizations have become a consumer lobby. For example, FAMSA supported the 1984 Federal Trade Commission "Funeral Rule" requiring mortuaries to give prices over the phone and is presently re-petitioning the FTC to eliminate non-declinable professional fees for funeral services. This fee, according to Lisa Carlson, FAMSA executive director, "is the one thing that consumers have no choice over."
She said the non-declinable fees, a "cover charge" issued before any specific services are added to a bill, rose 71 percent during the first six years they went into effect, from 1981-1987.
The average industry non-declinable fee today is $1025, Carlson said, with corporate-owned mortuaries ranging 20 to 90 percent higher. "Stewart's (average) is $1995," Carlson said.
FAMSA, the only nonprofit educational organization in the country monitoring the funeral industry full-time for consumers, publishes a monthly newsletter "dedicated to a consumer's right to choose a meaningful, affordable funeral."
Carlson herself made the national media in the early 1980s by opting out of a commercial funeral and burial when her husband died. "I had almost no money in the bank, so I drove his body with a friend to the crematorium. I planned an open house gathering and I buried his remains in the spring," Carlson said. "If I had had money, I would have given away what turned out to be a very meaningful experience."
When Carlson's mother-in-law died of AIDS in 1986, her entire family handled the mortuary, funeral and cemetery tasks. "My sons built the box, and we drove to a country family property and spent the afternoon and evening digging the grave by hand," Carlson said. The following weekend, a graveside memorial service celebrating the life of this former college professor drew a large crowd. "Almost no one there knew anyone else. There were stories and music and planting flowers. There was no set ritual. It was totally spontaneous," she said.
Those experiences prompted Carlson's book, Caring for The Dead: Your Final Act of Love, which will soon come out in a second edition. The book is packed with legal and practical details to help individuals, families and communities deepen the experience of the death of a loved one by handling funeral arrangements on their own.
Most Recent Reference Articles
- Not Part of the Public: Non-indigenous policies and the health of indigenous South Australians 1836-1973
- Homophobia: An Australian History
- Social inclusion and sport: culturally diverse women's perspectives
- Who to serve? The ethical dilemma of employment consultants in nonprofit disability employment network organisations
- Vocational education, self-employment and burnout among Australian workers

