On regulations - readers are asked to answer a 6-question survey on new regulations for federal agencies - Where I Stand - Brief Article

Nation's Business, April, 1996

Background: As part of his "re-inventing government" effort in 1993, President Clinton issued an executive order requiring federal agencies to devise regulations in a cost-effective way, allow more flexible methods of compliance, and consider the total economic impact of proposed rules.

Use the attached, postage-paid Reader Response Card to indicate whether you think the president's specific directives for developing regulations, summarized in Nos. 1 through 6, have produced a better or worse situation or no noticeable change. Or circle your answers and fax this page to (202) 463-5636.

Results of this poll will be forwarded to administration officials and congressional leaders.

President's Order:

Determine whether the proposed new regulation is required because of problems created wholly or in part by existing regulations or laws.

1. Better 2. Worse 3. No change

President's Order:

Consider alternatives to direct regulation, including market-based, economic incentives aimed at achieving the desired result.

1. Better 2. Worse 3. No change

President's Order:

Where practicable, specify the desired result of a rule, rather than specific actions a business or unit of government must take to achieve it.

1. Better 2. Worse 3. No change

President's Order:

Ensure that the regulation imposes the least possible burden on individuals, businesses, small communities, and governments, and consider the costs of cumulative regulation.

1. Better 2. Worse 3. No change

President's Order:

Write the regulation in simple and easy-to-understand language to minimize uncertainties and lawsuits.

1. Better 2. Worse 3. Nochange

President's Order:

Assess both the costs and the benefits of the proposed regulation.

1. Better 2. Worse 3. No change