Technology Industry
Industry: Email Alert RSS FeedSolvents' link to birth defects bolstered
Science News, March 27, 1999 by N. Seppa
Since 1985, researchers at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto have offered a program called Motherisk for women in their child-bearing years who are concerned that they have been exposed to harmful chemicals or radiation.
Now, potent evidence that Motherisk researchers accumulated over 10 years indicates that many women have good cause for worry.
Pregnant women exposed to organic solvents are indeed much more likely to have a deformed baby than unexposed women are, the scientists report in the March 24/31 Journal of the American Medical Association.
Most RecentTechnology Articles
- The Google Manifesto: Dr. Open and Mr. Closed
- RIM Is Getting Too Successful for Its Customers' Good
- Tech Law: Google Loses in France, GPL Suits Target Many, IBM Sued, More
- Microsoft Moves Fast, Already Has Custom XML Patch for Word
- Microsoft Might Get Advantage or Pain from Order To Not Sell Word
- More »
Between 1986 and 1996, the investigators tracked and recorded the outcomes of pregnancies in 125 pregnant women exposed to organic solvents at workplaces such as factories, laboratories, graphic design businesses, and print shops. The solvents included phenols, xylene, acetone, and trichloroethylene.
The women were exposed for at least 4 months of their pregnancy, including the entire first trimester, says study coauthor Sohail Khattak, a pediatrician and clinical pharmacologist at the hospital. The first trimester is a critical time during which organs form in a fetus, he explains.
Khattak and his colleagues also tracked 125 pregnant women who had sought advice from Motherisk doctors for what turned out to be harmless exposures to chemicals, such as taking acetaminophen during pregnancy. These women were matched to the exposed group by age and lifestyle.
Most of the women in both groups were referred to Motherisk by their doctors, but some came in on their own.
Of 113 live births to the women exposed to the chemicals, 13 babies--12 percent of births--had major malformations, such as deafness or a heart defect. Five other babies had minor birth defects. Twelve of the pregnancies ended in miscarriage or abortion.
Women in the control group had 115 live births, but only one baby had a major birth defect and one had a minor deformity.
Among healthy mothers such as these, the expected rate for major abnormalities stands at 1 to 3 percent.
One new finding might provide a warning sign. Of the 125 exposed women, 75 had complained during pregnancy that organic chemicals were giving them headaches or breathing problems. Of the 13 major defects in the exposed group, 12 occurred in babies born to these women.
"We were quite amazed at the degree of effect we found," Khattak says.
The exposed women also had nine premature births, compared with three in the control group. This is the first study to measure premature births among women exposed to organic solvents, Khattak says.
Earlier tests in animals had shown that chemicals inhaled by pregnant rodents can cross the placental barrier to damage their young. Some studies of human mothers hinted that exposure to organic solvents might be to blame for birth defects, but others did not.
Because the Motherisk researchers identified the exposed women early in pregnancy, their work avoids the errors and biases of studies that later ask mothers to recall their exposures during pregnancy, says Richard K. Miller, an obstetrician and gynecologist at the University of Rochester (N.Y.) Medical Center.
"This paper from Motherisk is certainly the benchmark for examining the relationship between maternal toxic [exposure] and birth defects," he says. Its results will change how doctors counsel pregnant women regarding occupational risks, especially those that cause symptoms in the women, he predicts.
CXO UnpluggedSmart Business interviews on BNET
Brought to you by CBS MoneyWatch.com
- Best- and Worst-Paid College Degrees
- 6 Things You Should Never Do on Twitter or Facebook
- How Much Sleep Do You Really Need?
- 6 Big Myths about Gas Mileage
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Reference Articles
- A Maryland state trooper gave Erik Bonstrom an $80 ticket for driving too slowly
- In California, postal worker Dean Hudson has been found guilty
- Alec Loorz, the 15-year-old founder of Kids vs. Global Warming and recent Brower Youth Award recipient, went to Congress in November for a press conference with Senators Barbara Boxer and John Kerry, who are championing legislation to stabilize US greenho
- Foreign exchange
- The buzz on bees
Most Recent Reference Publications
Most Popular Reference Articles
- Credit card debt on college campuses: causes, consequences, and solutions
- 9 questions to ask your new lover: what you were afraid to ask, but always wanted to know
- How Tyler Perry rose from homelessness to a $5 million mansion
- Rejoice anyway - Zephaniah 3:14-20, Philippians 4:4-7 - Living by the Word - Column
- Living by the word



