Solid proof offered for famous conjecture - Spheres in Disguise - Grigori Perelman proves Poincare conjecture

Science News, April 26, 2003 by E. Klarreich

A Russian mathematician may have finally cracked one of the most famous problems in mathematics: the Poincare conjecture, a question about the shapes of three-dimensional spaces. If his work is correct, it will make him eligible for a $1 million prize from the Clay Mathematics Institute in Cambridge, Mass., which has declared the conjecture one of the seven most important mathematical problems of the new millennium.

More than 100 mathematicians packed a lecture hall at the State University of New York at Stony Brook this week to hear Grigori Perelman of the Steklov Mathematical Institute in St. Petersburg, Russia, describe his work. Last week, Perelman told an equally attentive audience at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) that he has proven the conjecture together with a broader problem called the Thurston geometrization conjecture. This second problem proposes that any three-dimensional space can be chopped in a standard way into pieces, each of which has a simple geometric structure.

Perelman has posted two papers about his research on the Internet (http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/math.DG/0303109 and http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/math.DG/0211159). Mathematicians are now scrutinizing every line of the work to verify its correctness.

"We're all waiting with bated breath," says Yair Minsky of Stony Brook, who attended the lecture there.

The Poincare conjecture belongs to the field of topology, which studies properties that are preserved when a shape is stretched or twisted without tearing. Topologically speaking, the surfaces of a doughnut and of a coffee cup are the same, but they're different from the surface of a ball.

Mathematicians have established criteria for distinguishing among types of surfaces. For example, consider a loop of string lying on a dosed surface. More than a century ago, mathematicians proved that if every such loop can be shrunk to a single point without leaving the surface, the object is a sphere. On a doughnut, by contrast, a loop that encircles the hole can't be shrank to a point.

The traditional, or two-dimensional, sphere is the set of all points in three-dimensional space that are a given distance from a fixed center. Mathematicians also study what they call the three-dimensional sphere--the set of all points a given distance from a center in four-dimensional space. French mathematician Henri Poincare conjectured 99 years ago that, just as in the case of surfaces, any dosed three-dimensional space in which loops can be tightened to a single point is really a three-dimensional sphere.

In the intervening years, dozens of mathematicians have put forth mistaken proofs, often very subtly in error. For that reason, mathematicians are hesitant to declare the conjecture settled until Perelman's proof has been thoroughly checked. But they agree that, unlike most previous attempts, Perelman's papers contain a wealth of important ideas that will be valuable even if his work turns out to fall short of proving the full Poincare conjecture.

"The first paper is already amazing," says Jeff Viaclovsky of MIT. "It's a major breakthrough".

COPYRIGHT 2003 Science Service, Inc.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Gale Group

 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
CXO UnpluggedSmart Business interviews on BNET

See and hear how senior level executives across the Asia Pacific are developing smart business ideas across a variety of sectors. The focus is on the future, and on how businesses need to evolve.

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with Thompson Gale

  • Your Work How to Win at Office Politics

    How to Win at Office Politics

    Like it or not, every workplace is a political environment. But operating effectively within it doesn’t have to mean sucking up, lying, or slinging dirt. In its purest form, office politics is simply about getting from here to there: securing a promotion, seeing an idea come to fruition, or gaining support to make an organizational change. Playing the game well is about defending your position, earning respect, exchanging favors, and keeping your sanity amid the chaos. To get started, you need to know what you really want from work, then orient your political moves toward those goals. It all starts with strong relationships and helping others; those people in return make up the support system that helps you realize your goals. Here’s how it’s done.

  • Your Industry The Five Worst Drug Companies of 2009

    The Five Worst Drug Companies of 2009

    These five companies have performed even worse than their peers and competitors. Investigations? Insider trading? Dirty factories? Recalls? Management churn? Scandals? They've got it all. In order of incompetence, BNET presents the five worst drug companies of 2009. Drumroll, please ...

  • Your Money Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money

    Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money

    Even smart people make financial moves that are downright illogical. Emotions and superstitions have a sneaky way of keeping you from rational financial decisions. But dumb choices can have serious, real-world consequences. Here are some of the biggest blunders we all make, plus tips from the experts on how to keep cool.