Sports Publications
Topic: RSS FeedChanging their minds and more
Sporting News, The, Nov 11, 2002 by Paul Attner
Let's hope what has happened this season with the Steelers, Jets, Redskins and Cowboys is the start of a trend, not a hiccup in the NFL's way of life. So much about the league continues to change; why not the way quarterbacks have been pampered and sheltered?
These four teams have benched their original starting quarterbacks, and we're just starting the second half of the season. Steve Spurrier has shuffled his starters three times, beginning with and now going back to Shane Matthews. Bill Cowher grew tired of Kordell Stewart's inconsistencies; enter Tommy Maddox. Quincy Carter might have pulled out two Dallas wins, but he wasn't productive enough for Jerry Jones and Dave Campo. Maybe Chad Hutchinson will be better. Vinny Testaverde is too old; Herman Edwards decided to try the young guy, Chad Pennington.
No. 1 quarterbacks should be treated like starting pitchers. If they aren't effective, get 'em out of there. Doesn't mean they're finished, doesn't mean their psyche is damaged permanently. Doesn't mean they can't be brought back. What if Roger Clemens took it personally every time he was relieved. Or Randy Johnson?
Yet the NFL way is to handle every quarterback decision as if the course of life just changed. Spurrier has it right when he likens it to golf. "If I am making a lot of bogeys, I'm just not going to be satisfied with the bogeys," he says. "I am going to figure out a way to make pars." If a quarterback is piling up bogeys, find a par shooter and send the starter to the driving range.
This no longer is a league in which patience wins--where you can absorb growing pains and mediocre performances at quarterback. If the first guy can't do it, try someone else. Just look at the standings. This is an NFL where one loss--and one poor quarterback performance--can indeed determine playoff fates.
These four coaches don't want to look back and wonder: What if? What if I had made a quarterback change early on? Would that have made a difference? They've eliminated the what-ifs at quarterback; other struggling teams should have the guts to duplicate their wisdom.
E-mail: pattner@sportingnews.com.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn’t Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Sports Articles
Most Recent Sports Publications
Most Popular Sports Articles
- "F you and your high powered rifle!" The Gary Fadden incident - The Ayoob files
- Scope mounting and sighting in: here's how to do it right the first time
- 'My heart is Thai': a window to Tiger's soul through his mother
- Top 10 most surprising players who never won a batting title
- Tikka's T3: intriguing sporting rifle from Finland



