2005 Ad
Sporting News, The, Nov 8, 2004 by Troy Aikman
Clancy Pendergast, the Cardinals' defensive coordinator, is a big fan of the Aikman Efficiency Ratings for team offense and defense--and not just because he's a friend of mine. It's because my ratings are a much more accurate barometer of how well his defense is performing.
Through Week 7, the Arizona defense ranked 24th in the official NFL rankings, which are based solely on yards allowed per game. Clancy's unit has given up a lot of yards, but it also has produced a ton of turnovers and surrendered few Points. That's why the Cardinals, whose defense has made them surprisingly competitive in the first half of the season, were No. 2 in my defensive team ratings.
My ratings are based on a complicated formula, one I can't begin to explain here. But I can say it takes into account the most critical factors in any team's success: points, turnovers, red zone efficiency, yards per play and first-down achievement. It also introduces some logic that is not present in existing rankings.
Scoring, for instance, is credited where it belongs. In NFL stat tables, any point a team scores is credited to its offense and any point an opponent scores is charged to the defense--even when the points are scored by defense or special teams. In my ratings, that obvious contradiction is corrected by removing points on returns and safeties. A team's defense isn't faulted when its quarterback's pass is returned for a touchdown, and a team's offense isn't inflated by its scoring-happy defense.
I also think it's important to weigh a team's ability to move the chains. Third-down percentage is part of the equation, but I also factor in total first downs so that a team that gets first downs quickly isn't dragged down by a low number of third-down opportunities.
Check out the Aikman Efficiency Ratings through Week 7. Some of the differences between my ratings and the NFL's are revealing. Consider Detroit. The Lions were 32nd in offense and 30th in defense, according to the NFL, but 16th and 12th, respectively, in my ratings. Which stats are more indicative of a team that was 4-2 after seven weeks?
As you'll recall from a previous column, I've asked the NFL to consider replacing its system of ranking team offense and defense with mine. By the time the NFL competition committee meets after the season, I anticipate having a lot of support from league coaches--Clancy among them.
The Troy Aikman Show airs at 5 p.m. ET every Thursday through the Super Bowl on Sporting News Radio. Listen online at radio.sportingnews.com.
Aikman Efficiency Ratings through Week 7 OFFENSE Aik. NFL Team AER 1 3 Colts 97.14 2 5 Chiefs 94.90 3 1 Vikings 93.75 4 4 Eagles 89.94 5 17 Chargers 88.37 6 2 Packers 87.55 7 12 Jets 85.94 8 20 Steelers 85.89 9 11 Patriots 85.39 10 6 Rams 84.71 11 16 Saints 79.42 12 8 Texans 78.18 13 7 Broncos 78.14 14 13 Seahawks 77.64 15 10 Cowboys 77.57 16 32 Lions 77.33 17 15 Jaguars 76.39 18 21 Panthers 74.98 19 22 Browns 74.40 20 9 Giants 73.46 21 19 Titans 72.62 22 14 49ers 71.38 23 25 Falcons 69.01 24 28 Cardinals 67.67 25 31 Ravens 67.16 26 18 Raiders 66.06 27 24 Buccaneers 65.62 28 27 Redskins 65.13 29 23 Bengals 63.83 30 29 Bears 63.12 31 26 Bills 59.92 32 30 Dolphins 57.73 DEFENSE 1 1 Redskins 86.77 2 24 Cardinals 86.62 3 2 Broncos 86.17 4 7 Ravens 86.11 5 12 Patriots 84.53 6 8 Seahawks 82.12 7 5 Bills 80.56 8 6 Steelers 79.94 9 20 Eagles 79.34 10 4 Dolphins 78.97 11 23 Bears 78.14 12 30 Lions 77.94 13 3 Buccaneers 76.04 14 22 Browns 74.85 15 15 Falcons 73.51 16 11 Jets 73.38 17 14 Giants 72.39 18 31 Colts 71.92 19 9 Chiefs 71.79 20 17 Chargers 71.16 21 26 Bengals 70.39 22 29 Vikings 69.72 23 10 Panthers 69.60 24 18 Jaguars 66.81 25 19 Titans 65.81 26 21 Packers 65.57 27 27 Texans 65.11 28 28 Rams 63.41 29 32 Saints 63.41 30 16 Raiders 60.93 31 13 49ers 59.75 32 25 Cowboys 56.85
COPYRIGHT 2004 Sporting News Publishing Co.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale Group