Transportation Industry
Clinton Giveth, Clinton Taketh Away - President Clinton's FY2000 budget proposal - Brief Article
Railway Age, March, 1999 by Frank N. Wilner
President Clinton's $1.8 trillion Fiscal Year 2000 budget proposal provides a 14% boost for mass transit, a 6% cut for Amtrak, and a 16% increase in FRA safety-related spending. FY 2000 begins Oct. 1.
The FRA budget would slip to $746 million from $778 million in FY 1999, due mostly to a $38 million reduction in Amtrak grants. Actually, Amtrak would receive the entire $571 million it sought-all earmarked for capital spending, but that definition is stretched to include rehabilitation and preventive maintenance. In 1997 Congress voted $2.2 billion for Amtrak capital improvements to be paid out over two years.
Related Results
Mass transit grants paid through the Federal Transit Administration would soar to $6.1 billion from $5.4 billion in FY 1999. Included are increased grants for local and regional light and commuter rail. The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century guarantees at least $5.8 billion in FY 2000 for mass transit.
The President's proposal for FRA's non-Amtrak spending-$175 million-includes $35 million transferred from a projected $1.5 billion Highway Trust Fund windfall and earmarked for three FRA pet projects. These include $15 million for grade-crossing closings on high speed rail lines, $10 million to implement positive train control on two demonstration corridors, and $10 million to help connect railroads with 67 decommissioned Air Force global-satellite base stations. The proposed budget also contains huge new freight railroad user charges that really are increased taxes as railroads have no choice but to accept Surface Transportation Board and FRA regulation.
While some $17 million is proposed for STB-about what it received in FY '99-the president wants the entire sum recovered through charges on unspecified users of STB services. In recent years, STB recovered about $1.2 million annually from railroads and shippers. However, more than $900,000 of that was paid in annual filing fees by major railroads applying for merger authority. Previous Clinton Administration attempts to charge shippers and railroads unspecified fees to pay the entire STB budget were rejected by strong Democratic and Republican majorities in the House and Senate.
More than $88 million in FRA user charges would be imposed on freight railroads by the president to fund safety initiatives and high speed rail research. A Reagan Administration tax on railroads to recover safety-regulation costs was canceled after four years by Congress in 1995 because short line railroads were paving up to 17% of their net income in such fees. Troubling to freight railroads is that despite a projected budget surplus, the 4.3 cents per gallon deficit-reduction fuel tax-costing railroads $160 million annually and which does not apply to motor carriers-is not slated for cancellation.
Also upsetting is budget language to eliminate a TEA-21 provision allowing railroads to qualify for lower-interest private-sector loans under a federal loan guarantee program. It is of no risk to taxpayers because required insurance premiums must be paid by non-federal sources. Most affected would be proposed intermodal connectors and short line efforts to increase rail weight to accommodate heavier loads. A similar highway program benefititing truckers is not targeted for abolition.
The Clinton administration also said in its budget it wants railroads to apply reflectorized tape to all rolling stock and ERA unilaterally to impose new power brake standards. The entire Congress will finalize the FY 2000 budget by fall following House and Senate subcommittee and committee hearings.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Samsung Mobile Highlights Mobile Innovation and Leadership at International CES 2010
- Qosmos Gains Momentum with Network Intelligence Technology
- Graphic.ly Debuts in Microsoft’s Keynote Address at Consumer Electronics Show
- Research and Markets: Construction Site Supplies Market in Russia: a Comprehensive Business Report
- Research and Markets: Overview of the Business & Enterprise Application Software and Services Market in Developed Asia-Pacific
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- Using object-oriented analysis and design over traditional structured analysis and design
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions



