Transportation Industry
For IC's UTU employees, three contract options
Railway Age, Jan, 1997
A ratification vote on a labor-management agreement is usually a simple yes-or-no proposition. But United Transportation Union members at Illinois Central are getting three options--and "no" is not one of them.
The three options are to accept:
A $23-per-hour wage rate, plus a one-time payment of $60,000 per employee in exchange for elimination of a productivity fund that has been part of agreements for a number of years.
A slightly modified version of the national agreement that was imposed through arbitration last year.
Binding arbitration.
The first option would replace the traditional mileage pay system with an hourly-based system that IC believes would make its UTU-represented employees among the highest paid in the industry. This is a concept based on a form of assigned service and assigned days off that would allow conductors and trainmen to work and rest on a more regular schedule than is typical in railroad operations.
UTU and management negotiators initialed a similar deal last year, but members then voted it down. The new version, IC says, should resolve employee concerns, especially those involving seniority issues, that helped to defeat the earlier proposed agreement.
The second option would closely parallel the 1996 national agreement. In the national bargaining situation, negotiators also thought they had an agreement but it failed of ratification, after which the carriers and the UTU accepted arbitration and the arbitrators imposed the settlement the negotiators had approved.
Acceptance of either option would settle outstanding issues between IC and the union into the next century. Whichever option gets the most votes (including the arbitration option) will be the one adopted. IC has about 700 UTU-represented employees, about 22% of its work force. Voting has been under way, and results were expected on Jan. 17.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions
- Using object-oriented analysis and design over traditional structured analysis and design


