Arts Publications
Topic: RSS FeedBetty Tompkins at Mitchell Algus
Art in America, Nov, 2005 by Steven Vincent
It was Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart who in 1964 articulated this famous definition of pornography: "I know it when I see it." One wonders what the good judge would have made of painter Betty Tompkins's salacious exhibition of seven acrylics on canvas and four pencil-on-paper drawings that depict sexual acts, erect penises, exposed vaginas and coitus continuous with an explicitness one associates more with old 42nd Street than with Chelsea. The result--at least in the typically politically correct, pristine environs of an art gallery--was rather startling.
For example, visitors to the gallery immediately confronted Blowjob Painting #1 (all works 2004), a highly graphic depiction of a pair of luscious lips and a tongue fellating the tip of a large penis. One proceeded to encounter three works successively and matter-of-factly titled Fuck Painting #10, #11 and #12, which offered peep show-worthy penetration shots. For more elevated tastes, Tompkins included Cunt Painting #3, a graceful sepia and white rendering of a vagina, and Fuck Grid #16, a delicately wrought pencil drawing of a simultaneous act of vaginal and anal sex.
Arousing? For this critic at least, yes. Mais est-ce que c'est l'art? I'll venture a second yes, if for no other reason than the wit and awareness with which Tompkins produced her work. After first sketching an outline based on commercial porn photographs, she defined the contours of her subjects' groins, orifices and appendages by marking the canvas with tiny words like "blow job," "suck," "kiss," "fuck." What might seem a gimmicky device actually gave the images a gritty, almost totemic quality, which, along with Tompkins's judicious use of incarnadine hues to represent flesh, captured the essentially turgid, repetitious and artificial language of pornography. Like a musician strumming a one-string guitar, Tompkins managed to tease a thin strand of art from smut--or perhaps vice versa.
More often than not, when an artist attempts to depict sex, the result is embarrassingly unerotic, like watching your parents trying to dance to rock music. It may be a dubious achievement, but Tompkins, who first created X-rated art over 35 years ago, got inside, so to speak, pornography, infusing her V-chip-activating pictures with a hetero-masculine mindset that mingles an obsession with prowess, size and repetition with a not-so-subtle fear of ridicule and performance failure.
Most Recent Arts Articles
- Slumdog comprador: coming to terms with the Slumdog phenomenon
- Still mining his Winnipeg: an interview with Guy Maddin
- It doesn't seem 'Canadian': quality television' and Canadian-American co-productions
- Second city or second country? The question of Canadian identity in SCTV'S transcultural text
- Hop on pop: jiangshi films in a transnational context
Most Recent Arts Publications
Most Popular Arts Articles
- What makes a successful business person? Business people who are tops in their field have a lot in common, and art professionals can learn a lot from their successes and strategies
- It's urban, it's real, but is this literature? Controversy rages over a new genre whose sales are headed off the charts
- The Horn identity: by day, Justin, Murdock is one of L.A.'s flashiest bachelors. By bight, he's Eliphas Horn, Goth antihero. (Eye).
- The Arnolfini double portrait: a simple solution
- Toni Cade Bambara's use of African American Vernacular English in "The Lesson"


