Proposed legislation hurts Head Start - Preschool Programs - Brief Article
USA Today (Society for the Advancement of Education), August, 2003
The national movement to change the Federal preschool program would do more harm than good, according to James Elicker, a professor of child development at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind., and former Head Start teacher. "Head Start is not broken, so why make radical and risky changes in its funding and administration?," he asks.
"There is substantial evidence that Head Start improves the health, school readiness, and long-term educational outcomes of low income children, as well as provides needed support and education for their parents. The program has extremely high customer satisfaction ratings, too."
The proposed legislation calls for transferring the funding and administration of Head Start from the Federal government to individual states using a block grant formula. "That would be a mistake at this time because administrative costs will undoubtedly increase; states will use the Federal funds to replace funds lost in state budget cuts and the net result will be a decrease in ... quality and a reduction in the total number of poor children" that are served by this extremely vital initiative.
Elicker fears that if the states inherit control of the program, it is likely the current comprehensive focus for Head Start will be lost. This could eliminate critical services, such as early education that teaches children social and academic skills, health and dental screenings and treatment, mental health and social services, and parent-education programs.
"Also, it is my understanding that the proposed legislation does not strongly mandate states to follow the current national Head Start program performance standards," which "have been the keystone of Head Start's quality and improvements over the past 37 years. If the performance standards are loosened, or if states are able to set their own standards according to changing political whims, Head Start as a high-quality national program for low-income children will soon be dismantled."
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Reference Articles
- A Maryland state trooper gave Erik Bonstrom an $80 ticket for driving too slowly
- In California, postal worker Dean Hudson has been found guilty
- Alec Loorz, the 15-year-old founder of Kids vs. Global Warming and recent Brower Youth Award recipient, went to Congress in November for a press conference with Senators Barbara Boxer and John Kerry, who are championing legislation to stabilize US greenho
- Foreign exchange
- The buzz on bees
Most Recent Reference Publications
Most Popular Reference Articles
- Credit card debt on college campuses: causes, consequences, and solutions
- 9 questions to ask your new lover: what you were afraid to ask, but always wanted to know
- How Tyler Perry rose from homelessness to a $5 million mansion
- Rejoice anyway - Zephaniah 3:14-20, Philippians 4:4-7 - Living by the Word - Column
- Living by the word


