Gays, lesbians, and the media: the slow road to acceptance

USA Today (Society for the Advancement of Education), July, 1996 by Barbara Raab

IN 1990, ABC lost half its advertisers and $1,000,000 for an episode of "thirtysomething" showing two men in bed. Just a few years ago, "Roseanne" was slammed for an on-screen lesbian kiss with Mariel Hemingway, and the Fox network got cold feet and cut a gay kiss from its ultra-hip "Melrose Place."

That was then. This is now: "Friends" celebrated a lesbian wedding in which Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich's real-life lesbian half-sister Candace officiated as minister. Transvestite RuPaul made a guest appearance as a flight attendant on "The Crew," a Fox comedy. On "Mad About You," the male lead's sister announced she is a lesbian. A gay precinct receptionist is a regular character on "NYPD Blue" and there was an openly gay secretary on "High Society." The list goes on and on. According to US magazine, during the 1994-95 television season alone, there were more than 15 lesbian and gay recurring characters on regular primetime shows. In 1996, the gay and lesbian presence in primetime television is unprecedented.

On cable, the Comedy Central network has presented several successful editions of a program called "Out There," a showcase for gay comedians. MTV carried the story of the late Pedro Zamora, a young gay Cuban man with AIDS, on "The Real World," It also has announced that lesbians and gays will be included in at least one episode of the network's dating game show, "Singled Out." (Imagine the old "Dating Game" letting bachelorettes question bachelorettes.)

On public television, there's a long-running gay and lesbian program called "In the Life." Television talk shows, though often crass and tacky, constantly are giving gays and lesbians a forum for shattering the silence about their lives. "Oprah," for example, did a show on gay marriage.

Over on the news side of television, where I work, though stories about and images of gays and lesbians have been slower in coming and less integrated into over-all coverage, there have been big changes in a relatively short time. Take, for instance, the way NBC News has covered one specific event that has taken place three times: the gay rights marches on Washington, first in 1979, then in 1987, and most recently in the spring of 1993.

In the 1979 broadcast, anchorwoman Jessica Savitch told the story of the march in approximately 25 seconds, in "voice-over" format, in which viewers see videotape of the event, but do not hear from any participants. At one point, Savitch clearly was perplexed by the word "homophobia" in the script she was reading; she said the word as though she never had heard it before. Today, of course, "homophobia" is used widely.

Coverage of the 1987 march lasted approximately 35 seconds, again in voice-over format, although anchorman Garrick Uttley put the march in better perspective. He reported that the demonstrators came to Washington to demand more protection from discrimination, as well as more money for AIDS research. The report used the term "AIDS victim," which people with AIDS always have found offensive, and ended by noting that "police reported no arrests and no incidents," a rather odd thing to say given that the videotape showed a very peaceful and compliant crowd.

By 1993, the news media had a much better sense of what the gay rights march was all about and had elevated its importance in its coverage. On NBC, Uttley was broadcasting live from Moscow on the night of the march. Normally, when an anchorman is on location, he's there for a journalistic reason that almost always is the lead story. On this night, though, the top story was that hundreds of thousands of "men and women gathered in the nation's capital, raising their voices and demanding change." Rather than a short voice-over read by the anchorman, it was reported by a correspondent live on the scene, with a taped reported in which many participants were interviewed. The reporter took notice of the fact that organizers disputed the Park Police's crowd estimates and explained that the event was meant to be "more than just a gay rights march. It was an attempt to demonstrate gay political power." In 1993, print coverage was far more extensive as well, both leading up to and after the march. Almost every daily newspaper in the U.S. featured a photograph of the march on its front page the following morning.

Coverage of the three marches is typical of the expansion and improvement of television news coverage of the "big ticket" stories involving gay issues. Topics such as homosexuals in the military, AIDS, and gay-bashing are too big for the news media to ignore.

There also has been some integration of lesbian and gay lives into over-all television news reporting. On Father's Day, 1995, for example, the "CBS Evening News" did a story about two men raising their two sons together. A broadcast of CNN's "Inside Business" series focused on marketing to the gay and lesbian consumer. On ABC, when Barbara Walters did a long profile of Hollywood billionaire David Geffen, they matter of factly discussed his homosexuality. The same thing occurred when Jane Pauley profiled breast cancer surgeon Susan Love on "Dateline NBC," as the doctor's lesbian partner was included in the story. In 1995, my show, "NBC Nightly News," won an award from the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation media watchdog group for a three-part series called "Gay in America."


 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with Thompson Gale

  • Your Work How to Win at Office Politics

    How to Win at Office Politics

    Like it or not, every workplace is a political environment. But operating effectively within it doesn’t have to mean sucking up, lying, or slinging dirt. In its purest form, office politics is simply about getting from here to there: securing a promotion, seeing an idea come to fruition, or gaining support to make an organizational change. Playing the game well is about defending your position, earning respect, exchanging favors, and keeping your sanity amid the chaos. To get started, you need to know what you really want from work, then orient your political moves toward those goals. It all starts with strong relationships and helping others; those people in return make up the support system that helps you realize your goals. Here’s how it’s done.

  • Your Industry The Five Worst Drug Companies of 2009

    The Five Worst Drug Companies of 2009

    These five companies have performed even worse than their peers and competitors. Investigations? Insider trading? Dirty factories? Recalls? Management churn? Scandals? They've got it all. In order of incompetence, BNET presents the five worst drug companies of 2009. Drumroll, please ...

  • Your Money Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money

    Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money

    Even smart people make financial moves that are downright illogical. Emotions and superstitions have a sneaky way of keeping you from rational financial decisions. But dumb choices can have serious, real-world consequences. Here are some of the biggest blunders we all make, plus tips from the experts on how to keep cool.