Smooth talk

National Review, April 25, 1986 by JOhn Simon

This, I'm afraid, cannot be explained away, as Miss Oates has tried to do, as the difference between the mid-Sixties, when the story was written, and the mid-Eighties, when the film was made: "a girl's coming of age that involves the succumbing to, but then rejecting, the 'trashy dreams' of her popteen culture." True, there is a chasm of time and sensibility between Oates '66 and Chopra-Cole '85.

Today Connie may well have had casual sex with the boys from the mall, and Miss Chopra, feminist that she doubtless is, would perceive her film as a 15-year-old woman's coming of age and self-assertion. But does her ending make sense? Is a tumble in the hay (or grass) with a cunning, ominous man twice her age and possibly a murderer the right rite of passage for a naive young girl? Is that the way for her to gain the upper hand, a new self-assurance, and charity toward her kinfolk--not to mention the ability to outgrow a favorite rock record? And what about all the other garish rock songs on the soundtrack, the combined work of James Taylor and four other musicians--has she outgrown them as well? With feminists like Joyce Chopra, who needs male supremacists?

COPYRIGHT 1986 National Review, Inc.
COPYRIGHT 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning
 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with Thompson Gale