Management advice: choosing the best corporate structure
Black Enterprise, Sept, 1998 by Deidra-Ann Parrish
One of the most fundamental decisions you make when getting your business off the ground is selecting its corporate structure, or what's known as its corporate entity. Each of the five basic categories the law recognizes directly impacts the tax and legal liabilities of both an enterprise and its principals. Here are your choices:
SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP. A sole proprietorship is the easiest kind of business to form and manage. The owner runs the business in his or her own name and has full legal and financial responsibility.
Pros: You make all decisions, you receive 100% of the profits and it's the easiest entity to dissolve.
Cons: Owners carry unlimited liability--whatever debts or legal encumbrances the business acquires are the owner's full responsibility. The law considers a sole proprietor and his business one and the same.
"In this day and age, that's a big risk for someone to take," says Scott D. Smith, partner in the Washington, D.C., national tax practice department of KPMG Peat Marwick. He advises business owners to seriously consider their level of liability when opting for sole proprietorship.
GENERAL PARTNERSHIP. This form of partnership is composed of two or more individuals who invest and share in managing a company and agree to split the profits and liabilities.
Pros: A general partnership is relatively free of government restrictions--forming one is as simple as buying a partnership certificate at your local business supply store. Also, it allows profits and losses to pass through, before taxes, to your personal income and be taxed only once.
Cons: General partnerships also carry unlimited liability, which means all members of the partnership are collectively responsible for all of the company's acts and debts.
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (L.P.). If pass-through benefit of a general partnership is appealing but sharing responsibility is not, consider a limited partnership. This is where a general partner teams with a partner with limited interest in the management of the business.
Pros: This business entity is best suited for a general partner looking for a silent partner(s) not involved in the day-to-day operation of the business (for example, an investor). The limited partner is not liable for debts and claims.
Cons: The general partner is liable for all debts and claims against the business.
S CORPORATION & LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (L.L.C.). According to Smith, many small companies are electing to adopt one of two business structures, a subchapter S corporation or a limited liability company, (L.L.C.). In some states, professionals such as lawyers, doctors and accountants can set up a limited liability partnership (L.L.P.).
An S corporation is limited to 75 shareholders, while an L.L.C. can have one or more shareholders (depending on the state), with no maximum.
Pros: Both protect principals from legal and financial liabilities and provide the pass-through tax benefit--income is generally taxed only once. L.L.C. registration is exploding, Smith says, because this entity also offers greater flexibility, such as less paperwork and fewer restrictions on shareholders.
Cons: In a number of states, an S corporation is subject to income taxes while an L.L.C. is generally not. Smith warns, however, that L.L.C.s are not panaceas. Though all 50 states and the District of Columbia recognize the L.L.C., they don't necessarily treat it the same. For example, in Texas and Michigan, an L.L.C. is taxed twice, like a regular corporation.
C CORPORATION. For companies experiencing significant growth, or planning to expand into other regions or go public, Smith suggests a C corporation, or "regular" corporation.
Pros: C corporations protect shareholders from any liabilities and allow large earnings to be retained and reinvested in the growth of the business.
Cons: This type of company is subject to double taxation of its income. It is taxed on corporate income, then taxed again on dividends from each shareholder's taxable income.
You should consult a qualified tax expert to help you determine which corporate structure suits your needs. And together you should review your structure annually to be certain it continues to serve your business model moving forward.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Research and Markets: Asia - Mobile Communication Tables of Statistics
- Reinsurance Rates Decline at January 1, 2010 Reinsurance Renewal, According to Annual Guy Carpenter Briefing
- Samsung Unveils the Next Generation of Camera – the NX10
- Harman Consumer America Implements Powerful New Retail Distribution Strategy
- MyShape® Premieres New Line of CJ by Cookie Johnson Jeans
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Using object-oriented analysis and design over traditional structured analysis and design
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions



