- Breaking News San Mateo County ninth-graders struggle to stay fit
- Breaking News Food and wine events
- Breaking News Ask Amy: What To Do When the Doctor Isn t in the House
- Breaking News Ed Blonz: Keep your diet normal pre-surgery
Court decision on virtual child porn draws debate
0 Comments | Insight on the News, June 3, 2002
Thank God for someone who is making sense. I was about to give up on all humankind until reading the column by Paul M. Rodriguez on "Virtual Child Porn's Very Real Consequences" [the last word, May 27].
When I remarked about the stupidity of the Supreme Court's decision that virtual child porn is protected by the Constitution, a male coworker said that the high court was correct--that this stuff is only cartoons and not pornography. That same coworker is becoming a new daddy. I want to see if his attitude will change now.
Karen Foster via the Internet
I totally agree with your column on child porn. I felt helpless and sickened when I first read the news regarding the Supreme Court ruling.
Most Popular Articles
Most Recent Articles
Most Popular Publications
Most Recent Publications
Something that was not considered is the claim that virtual images of children do not use real children as their source. In fact they do, morphing them to disguise the artifice.
Virtual images and their components/textures are indeed based upon real pictures of children--images captured, disassembled and categorized to be used later at the artist's command.
Kirk Hubbell via the Internet
I have a 14-year-old sister whom I love dearly. These idiots that head up our Supreme Court now are potentially putting her at risk. Are we non-pedophile, nonbureaucrats the only ones who seem to understand this? All in the name of free speech, right?
Eric, USMC via the Internet
The Supreme Court's judgment is a victory for freedom and liberty and should be applauded as such. No matter how vile or evil pedophilia may be, we cannot criminalize the thought of committing the act.
Let's suppose that I draw a digital image of myself getting romantic with an emu, or I write a text describing this weird fantasy. Will the Humane Society come after me? Should they? Who is the victim?
My point is that we cannot imprison people for thinking about committing a crime. Once that Pandora's box is open, where does it end?
Francois Goyeau Longueuil, Quebec
- Wicca Casts Spell on Teen-Age Girls
- Unseen hand of religion extends America's reach
- Teachers strike back at disruptive students
- America's Quiet Epidemic
- Can better sex come with a pill? The nineties' impotence cure
- The Truth About the Dietary Supplement Act
- Wolf Pack Bites Back
- Give kids the three R's, not Character 'R Us - criticism of character education programs - Column
- Getting to the root of beautiful hair: shiny, silky hair begins with a healthy scalp - includes list of resources and a recipe for an herbal scalp tonic
- Portfolio forecasting tools: what you need to know
- Made from scratch: When Honda built a plant in Alabama it also built a workforce-using local workers who had no experience in making cars - Recruitment & Hiring
- Locational determinants of foreign direct investment in an emerging market economy: Evidence from Turkey
- Personality and organizational citizenship behavior
- SAS #82: sword or shield?
- Taylor Fund L.P. Gains 40.53% in Third Quarter
- A multi-class SVM classifier utilizing binary decision tree