- Breaking News San Mateo County ninth-graders struggle to stay fit
- Breaking News Food and wine events
- Breaking News Ask Amy: What To Do When the Doctor Isn t in the House
- Breaking News Ed Blonz: Keep your diet normal pre-surgery
Hypocrisy of Democrats exposed in Bush photo flap
0 Comments | Insight on the News, June 10, 2002 | by Shelley Aamodt
As a self-employed business owner, I produce media presentations for all occasions. Last winter I donated a project to the local Republican Party that was used at the county and district levels. The procedure necessary to create such presentations requires royalty-free markets.
After exhausting the normal avenues of research, I had found few photographs of President George W. Bush available. With knowledge of legal and ethics issues, I contacted the national GOP headquarters and eventually the individual in the White House responsible for photographs.
Most Popular Articles
Most Recent Articles
I kindly was told that if I was unable to find photographs through the public domain, I would need to purchase them through a business. This meant they would cost me a pretty penny, regardless of the fact that the presentation would be honoring the president. Not one to be defeated, I gathered personal photos and artwork by using my creative juices and contacting friends and acquaintances.
With the Democrats' latest pettiness showing over the photograph of President Bush on Sept. 11 and my past experience, I wanted a few questions answered. Did the Republican Party purchase the photograph through the proper channels? Did the recipient receive the photographs properly? Could others purchase the same photograph for their use? The answer to all these questions is an affirmative.
Now with this information, I needed to ask myself who really was exploiting the photograph for political purposes. Could it possibly be the same Democratic Party that so fervently defended the Lincoln Bedroom sleep-overs, White House coffee parties, donations from Buddhist monks, White House office fund-raising phone calls, party-connection foreign trips, cemetery-privilege uproar, many questionable foreign campaign-money contributions and last-minute pardons for contributors?
What hypocrisy shown! How shameful for anyone even to acknowledge that they would defend such silliness, let alone report on it.
Shelley Aamodt Menomonie, Wis.
- New fabric for diapers and ski wear
- Wicca Casts Spell on Teen-Age Girls
- Unseen hand of religion extends America's reach
- Teachers strike back at disruptive students
- America's Quiet Epidemic
- Can better sex come with a pill? The nineties' impotence cure
- The Truth About the Dietary Supplement Act
- Wolf Pack Bites Back
- Getting to the root of beautiful hair: shiny, silky hair begins with a healthy scalp - includes list of resources and a recipe for an herbal scalp tonic
- Made from scratch: When Honda built a plant in Alabama it also built a workforce-using local workers who had no experience in making cars - Recruitment & Hiring
- Portfolio forecasting tools: what you need to know
- Industry Experts Launch Money Management Resources to Help People Overcome Debt and Learn Proper Money Management Practices
- Why fly solo when an executive assistant can accelerate your CLNC® business?
- Banking technology, technological learning and competition: comparative case studies in Thai banking
- Traction Named #1 Interactive Agency for 2009 by BtoB Magazine
- John Seely Brown Inducted Into 2004 Industry Hall of Fame
Content provided in partnership with