- Breaking News San Mateo County ninth-graders struggle to stay fit
- Breaking News Food and wine events
- Breaking News Ask Amy: What To Do When the Doctor Isn t in the House
- Breaking News Ed Blonz: Keep your diet normal pre-surgery
Religion stands up to Big Brother - Christian Libertarians oppose pornography and drug abuse and government intervention to prevent their pervasiveness; includes analysis of the work of Reverend Robert Sirico and the Action Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty
0 Comments | Insight on the News, June 7, 1993 | by Richard Miniter
Perhaps the biggest policy difference between the religious right and Christian libertarians is on the issue of homosexuality. Many Christians consider sodomy -- in fact any sex outside of marriage -- sinful. What sets Christian libertarians apart is that they favor repealing sodomy laws. "Churches have every right, and indeed obligation, to preach that sex properly belongs within the covenant of marriage," Bandow wrote in a letter to the Washington Post. "Of course, this bars nonmarital heterosexual sex as well as homosexual sex. ...Sexually active gay -- and heterosexual -- singles are victimizing themselves, not nonconsenting third parties. Thus, there is no intrinsic reason for government to ban homosexual behavior."
Most Popular Articles
Most Recent Articles
Most Popular Publications
Most Recent Publications
Christian libertarians are also making some thunder on the left. They are challenging an idea dear to theologians such as John Cort, author of Christian Socialism, that capitalism is fundamentally immoral. "A Christian could, not to mention should, be a socialist," writes Cort, who calls upon the "spirit of Christian love" to support redistribution of wealth. Others cite the Gospels' frequent criticism of the wealthy and the particular attention Jesus paid to those at the bottom of Jewish society.
Christian libertarians respond that most of the passages cited by those on the religious left are not core tenets of Christian faith, and they also point to the writings of Saints Peter and Paul. Peter told followers that they had no obligation to sell their property and turn the proceeds over to the church, although many early Christians freely shared their possessions with other believers and some lived communally. Paul advised in 2 Corinthians: "Each man should give what he has decided in his heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver." The policy prescription, according to Bandow? "A faith that refuses to order its adherents to give not surprisingly provides little support for using the state to make others give."
- Wicca Casts Spell on Teen-Age Girls
- Unseen hand of religion extends America's reach
- Teachers strike back at disruptive students
- America's Quiet Epidemic
- Can better sex come with a pill? The nineties' impotence cure
- The Truth About the Dietary Supplement Act
- Wolf Pack Bites Back
- Give kids the three R's, not Character 'R Us - criticism of character education programs - Column
- Getting to the root of beautiful hair: shiny, silky hair begins with a healthy scalp - includes list of resources and a recipe for an herbal scalp tonic
- Portfolio forecasting tools: what you need to know
- Made from scratch: When Honda built a plant in Alabama it also built a workforce-using local workers who had no experience in making cars - Recruitment & Hiring
- Taylor Fund L.P. Gains 40.53% in Third Quarter
- SAS #82: sword or shield?
- Personality and organizational citizenship behavior
- Fighting financial reporting fraud
- The Middle Management Challenge: Moving From Crisis to Empowerment. - book reviews