UN Security Council resolution on "no-fly" zone over Bosnia-Hercegovina - includes statement by U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Edward J. Perkins - Transcript

US Department of State Dispatch, Oct 19, 1992

The Security Council,

Reaffirming its resolution 713 (1991) and all subsequent relevant resolutions,

Determined to ensure the safety of humanitarian flights to Bosnia and Herzegovina,

Noting the readiness of the parties, expressed in the framework of the London Conference, to take appropriate steps in order to ensure the safety of humanitarian flights and their commitment at that Conference to a ban on military flights,

Recalling in this context the Joint Declaration[1] signed at Geneva on 30 September 1992 by the Presidents of the Republic of Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro), and in particular paragraph 7 thereof,

Recalling also the agreement reached on air issues at Geneva on 15 September 1992 among all the parties concerned in the framework of the Working Group on Confidence and Security-building and Verification Measures of the London Conference,[2]

Alarmed at reports that military flights over the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina are none the less continuing,

Noting the letter of 4 October 1992 from the President of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina addressed to the President of the Security Council,[3]

Considering that the establishment of a ban on military flights in the airspace of Bosnia and Herzegovina constitutes an essential element for the safety of the delivery of humanitarian assistance and a decisive step for the cessation of hostilities in Bosnia and Herzegovina,

Acting pursuant to the provisions of resolution 770 (1992) aimed at ensuring the safety of the delivery of humanitarian assistance in Bosnia and Herzegovina,

1. Decides to establish a ban on military flights in the airspace of Bosnia and Herzegovina, this ban not to apply to United Nations Protection Force flights or to other flights in support of United Nations operations, including humanitarian assistance;

2. Requests the United Nations Protection Force to monitor compliance with the ban on military flights, including the placement of observers where necessary at airfields in the territory of the former Yugoslavia;

3. Also requests the United Nations Protection Force to ensure, through an appropriate mechanism for approval and inspection, that the purpose of flights to and from Bosnia and Herzegovina other than those banned by paragraph 1 above is consistent with Security Council resolutions;

4. Requests the Secretary-General to report to the Council on a periodic basis on the implementation of the present resolution and to report immediately any evidence of violations;

5. Calls upon States to take nationally or through regional agencies or arrangements all measures necessary to provide assistance to the United Nations Protection Force, based on technical monitoring and other capabilities, for the purposes of paragraph 2 above;

6. Undertakes to examine without delay all the information brought to its attention concerning the implementation of the ban on military flights in Bosnia and Herzegovina and, in the case of violations, to consider urgently the further measures necessary to enforce this ban;

7. Decides to remain actively seized of the matter. VOTE: 14-0-1 (China).

Statement by the US Permanent Representative to the United Nations to the UN Security Council in explanation of the vote on the "No-Fly"Zone over Bosnia-Hercegovina, New York City, October 9, 1992.

Mr. President, in establishing a "no-fly" zone over Bosnia-Hercegovina, the Security Council is taking an important step to address the violence that has wracked that republic and to support the efforts of the London conference.

Our support for this action was clearly stated by President Bush on October 2, when he observed:

At London, the parties agreed to a ban on all military flights over Bosnia. Yet the bombing of defenseless population centers has actually increased. This flagrant disregard for human life and for a dear agreement requires a response from the international community, and we will take steps to see that the ban is respected.

The London conference agreements reflect the approach of the international community to the crisis and include the concurrence of the warring parties in Bosnia. The proposed UN Security Council resolution codifies a ban on military flights in Bosnia-Hercegovina, an action specifically agreed to by Bosnian Serb representatives.

Our vote in favor of the current resolution reflects our view that, in the case of violations, it binds the Council to further action. It is up to the parties themselves to carry through on all London commitments and this resolution calling for the ban of military flights over Bosnia-Hercegovina. Such responsible action would remove from this body the need to consider further enforcement measures resulting from noncompliance.

If, however, the current resolution is violated, my government will move to seek adoption by the Council of a further resolution mandating enforcement of a "no-fly" zone over Bosnia-Hercegovina.

[1]S/24476, annex.

[2]S/24634, annex.

[3]S/246 16.

COPYRIGHT 1992 U.S. Government Printing Office
COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group
 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with Thompson Gale