Advice & Dissent - Letter to the Editor

E: The Environmental Magazine, Jan, 2001

LETTERS FROM OUR READERS

JUST WARMING UP

Although the news presented from around the world on climate change is alarming ("Welcome to the Greenhouse Century," September/October 2000), your special report is very much appreciated. Contrary to public perception, this issue has been discussed for more than a century. But it seems as though our western culture's profit incentive and residual war-based economy (weapons and their delivery systems are created from fossil fuels and nuclear power) are almost oblivious to the tens of billions of tons of carbon dioxide entering the Earth's atmosphere every year. Isn't it time for the people of the U.S. to match our economic activities with our ecological concerns?

I'd also like to point out a correction, however. In your E Word editorial, you refer to "five tons of carbon dioxide per U.S. citizen" and also state "Americans will have pumped another billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere." But these tonnages are actually for carbon alone. Your statistics, allowing for some correction due to rounding off, are more accurately expressed as "20 tons of carbon dioxide per U.S. citizen per year," and "Americans add about 5.5 billion tons of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere every year."

James Newberry New Haven, CT

Global warming has come to my part of Connecticut in the form of bizarre instances of extreme weather. Last winter, for instance, there were several marathon thunderstorms. I remember that one day the thunder and lightning began mid-afternoon and went on until 11 p.m. or later; yet there was hardly any rain. Then there were unseasonal interludes of mild spring weather, sandwiched between bursts of such bone-chilling cold that I had to carry my dog home, the frozen ground hurt her feet so.

When does the anecdotal, like my observations and some of those cited in your September 2000 cover story, merit elevation to the status of evidence? I suppose not until the situation has become so critical that business interests and politicians feel safe in clamoring for large-scale initiatives, costing billions of tax dollars, to put right what could have been rectified more easily and cheaply if only they had had the courage to take action sooner.

Robert Davey Bridgeport, CT

I would like to commend you on your global warming issue. The mainstream media has so far said little about a topic that a large majority of independent scientists believe is a real danger to the future of this planet. I fail to understand why, with such a threat hanging over us, we need to wait for absolute proof and total agreement before acting. Is it worth jeopardizing the future of our children, grandchildren and other life on this globe? You have done a good job of reviewing scientific evidence, and also of giving concrete examples of what has already happened all over the Earth.

Independent periodicals such as E Magazine are essential in our society for keeping citizens aware of crucial problems, which magazines that depend heavily on advertising are afraid to touch. Thank you for your hard work and insights. Keep it up!

Elizabeth Mark Alexandria, VA

Your article on global warming told a fascinating and little-understood story that nonetheless has crucial implications for life in the 21st century. Global warming is no longer just a theory to be debated in academic circles: It is having real effects on real people. It's disturbing to consider that some skeptics still say that the science isn't in when a plurality of climate scientists agree that it is, and there is so much anecdotal evidence to suggest the process has already started.

While it may be too early to advise friends and family not to buy beachfront property, it's plain that the world will have to brace itself for the onset of warmer weather, rising tides and an increase in storms, floods and general disruption. Only by reducing fossil fuel use can we hope to repair the damage already done to the atmosphere. E's story and the mounting evidence of these devastating effects will, I hope, prod the nations of the world to hurry up and take action.

Jim Mason Mount Vernon, MO

In E's special issue on global warming, I appreciate how you pointed out the salience of the problem to all aspects of environmental thinking and activism. Having just finished researching The Global Warming Desk Reference (to be published next year by Greenwood Press), I was impressed by the depth and accuracy of the writing. Ross Gelbspan, who wrote the introduction, is always good on the subject, and I also liked the specific emphasis placed on various parts of the world, especially China.

Global warming is a very large subject, and even a special issue can't stretch to cover it all. Other aspects of the problem warrant more in-depth coverage, such as ozone depletion's relationship to global warming, and the positive steps being pursued to reduce greenhouse gases in many European countries, especially Great Britain and Denmark. A third area that needs deeper examination is the devastation faced by coral reefs around the world.