Health Care Industry
Industry: Email Alert RSS FeedAttitudes toward physical education and class preferences of Turkish adolescents in terms of school gender composition
Adolescence, Summer, 2005 by Canan Koca, F. Hulya Asci, Giyasettin Demirhan
Single-sex versus coeducation has developed into a long-standing debate which continues to flourish (Mael, 1998). From the early 1980s a large body of research in several Western countries such as Great Britain, Belgium, Canada, Australia, and the U.S. has accumulated on the advantages and disadvantages for boys and especially for girls (Arnot, 1983; Brutsaert & Houtte, 2004; Durrant, 1992; Dyer & Tiggeman, 1996; Granleese & Joseph, 1993; Lee & Marks, 1990; Mael, 1998; Mensinger, 2001; Shmurak, 1998).
More Articles of Interest
- "I hate Phys. Ed.": adolescent girls talk about physical education
- Single-sex and coeducation physical education: perspectives of adolescent...
- Attitudes toward physical education: a study of high school students from...
- Middle school students' perceptions of coed versus non-coed physical education
- Attitudes of middle school students toward their physical education teachers...
The debate commonly centered around the need for equal education opportunities for girls and boys by focusing on different aspects of schooling. Of all the curriculum areas of contemporary schooling, Physical Education (PE) provides the optimum opportunity for focus on gender inequities. Scraton (1990) has described school PE as overtly reinforcing gender differences in terms of the activities offered, and covertly through the attitudes and reactions of those involved in the policy and practice of PE. On the other hand, the social construction of the body in PE and sport that is focused on issues of slenderness, muscularity, and physicality, has been of central importance to the construction of femininity and masculinity (Connell, 1983; Hall, 1996). Therefore, keeping in mind the ongoing debate on the effectiveness of single-sex and coeducational schools for gender equity, it seems important to examine students' attitudes toward PE and PE class preferences in these two different types of school.
Attitudes toward PE
In recent years, there has been an increase in the body of knowledge in PE in terms of student attitudes. The increase in interest may also be attributed to the influence of attitudes toward future participation in physical activities outside school (Carlson, 1995; Ennis, 1996; Portman, 1995), to student achievement in PE (Graham, 1995; Lee, 1997; Silverman, 1993; Subramaniam & Silverman, 2000), and to the availability of knowledge gained about students' attitudes toward PE for developing curricula (Cothran & Ennis, 1998).
Since gender plays an important mediating role in attitudes toward PE, many studies have compared girls' and boys' attitudes. In these studies, boys were found to display more positive attitudes toward physical activities that were challenging and had an element of risk (Folsom-Meek, 1992; Smoll & Schutz, 1980), whereas girls showed more favorable attitudes toward physical activities emphasizing aesthetics (Birtwistle & Brodie, 1991; Folsom-Meek, 1992; Hicks, Wiggins, Crist, & Moode, 2001; Smoll & Schutz, 1980).
PE Class Preferences: Single-sex or Coed?
If we consider students as being capable of understanding the significance of the gender composition of the classroom on their learning, then preferences for single-sex or coed PE may help us to understand their experiences in different classroom settings. In this regard, recent qualitative studies (Olafson, 2002; Osborne, Bauer, & Sutliff, 2002) have examined students' PE class preferences. Osborne and his colleagues (2002) reported that although the choice of single-sex or coed PE is largely based on curriculum objectives, students favor single-sex PE.
A study by Treanor, Graber, Housner, and Wiegand (1998) examined participation in a year-long multi-activity PE program in which classes were coeducational in the fall semester and single-sex in the spring semester. The findings indicated that middle school students showed preferences for single-sex PE regardless of perceived level of skill, fitness, or effort. Both boys and girls perceived that they performed skills and played team sports better, received more practice opportunities, and were less fearful of injury in single-sex PE. Similarly, Lirgg's (1993) 10-week basketball study reported that both male and female middle school students preferred single-sex PE.
Over the past few decades, the education system in Turkey, as in some Western countries, has become progressively coeducational. The versatile and comprehensive education reform, which seeks to ensure that student-centered education is carried out in all types and levels of education and conform with the requirements of the times and society, that no individual is left out of the education process for any reason, started in 1997 and continues into the 2000s. With this reform, coeducation became the norm in the Turkish educational system to ensure that girls and boys received the same educational opportunities. At present, all general public schools and all private schools are coeducational and only vocational and religious schools are single-sex. The underlying reason for the foundation of separate Vocational High Schools for girls and for boys is mainly the gender division in the vocations themselves. In the present study, vocational schools were selected as the single-sex schools for comparative analysis.
In spite of the growth in the literature on the effectiveness of coeducational and single-sex schooling, studies in sport science literature that have investigated students' attitudes toward PE and on PE class preference with respect to gender composition of school are limited. Therefore, based on the previous research it was hypothesised that there would be a significant difference in students' attitudes toward PE and PE class preferences between single-sex and coed schools, and there would be a significant difference in students' attitudes between girls and boys.
Brought to you by CBS MoneyWatch.com
- Best- and Worst-Paid College Degrees
- 6 Things You Should Never Do on Twitter or Facebook
- How Much Sleep Do You Really Need?
- 6 Big Myths about Gas Mileage
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Health Articles
Most Recent Health Publications
Most Popular Health Articles
- Make running easier: with this unique 'pose running' technique, you'll learn to actually enjoy your fat-burning sessions
- 50 home remedies that work: these safe, fast, and effective fixes will relieve what ails you - Cover Story
- Detox in 7 days: a detoux diet can help you shed up to 10 pounds and leave you feeling terrific. Our weeklong plan shows you how to lose the weight and keep it off - Cover story
- Treat sinusitis naturally: breath easy and relieve sinus pressure with these remedies - Quick Fixes and Long-Term Solutions
- All about nightshades: explore the hidden hazards of your favorite food with macrobiotic nutritionist Lino Stanchich



