A proposal and challenge for proponents and skeptics of psi

Journal of Parapsychology, The, Spring, 2004 by J.E. Kennedy

MILTON, J. (1999). Should ganzfeld research continue to be crucial in the search for a replicable psi effect? Part I. Discussion paper and introduction to an electronic-mail discussion. Journal of Parapsychology, 63, 309-333.

OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (1989). Report of a workshop on experimental parapsychology. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 83, 317-339.

PARKER, A. (2000). A review of the ganzfeld work at Gothenburg University. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 64, 1-15.

RADIN, D., & NELSON, R. (2000). Meta-analysis of mind-matter interaction experiments: 1959 to 2000. Unpublished manuscript, Boundary Institute, Los Altos, CA, and Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research, Princeton University.

SCHMEIDLER, G.R., & EDGE, H. (1999). Should ganzfeld research continue to be crucial in the search for a replicable psi effect? Part II. Edited ganzfeld debate. Journal of Parapsychology, 63, 335388.

STEINKAMP, F., BOLLER, E., & BOSCH, H. (2002). Experiments examining the possibility of human intention interactions with random number generators: A preliminary meta-analysis [Abstract]. Journal of Parapsychology, 66, 238-239.

STORM, L. (2000). Research note: Replicable evidence of psi: A revision of Milton's (1999) meta-analysis of ganzfeld databases. Journal of Parapsychology, 64, 411-416.

UTTS, J. (1986). The ganzfeld debate: A statistician's perspective. Journal of Parapsychology, 50, 393-402.

WEZELMAN, R., & BIERMAN, D.J. (1997). Process oriented ganzfeld research in Amsterdam: Series IVb, emotionality of target material, series V and series VI: Judging procedure and altered states of consciousness. Proceedings of Presented Papers: The Parapsychological Association 40th Annual Convention, 477-491.

Boulder, CO, USA

72130.1210@compuserve.com