Health Care Industry
Industry: Email Alert RSS FeedInfluence of dental status on dietary intake and survival in community-dwelling elderly subjects
Age and Ageing, Nov, 1997 by Ildebrando Appollonio, Corrado Carabellese, Allessandra Frattola, Marco Trabucchi
Introduction
Several studies (but not all--see [1] for an opposite view) have documented nutritional inadequacies (both deficiencies and excesses) in older populations [2], although the use of different measures of nutritional status sometimes makes it difficult to compare such studies [3].
Nutritional well-being plays an essential role in health promotion and maintenance in older people [4-8]; thus, it is important to identify the main determinants of nutritional status in the elderly population. Dietary habits, food intake and oral health changes are important factors, but their reciprocal effects and relationships with overall nutritional status are complex and controversial [9, 10]. In addition, methodological problems and inconsistencies among the different studies have clouded this area of research [9, 11].
Most RecentHealth Care Articles
Furthermore, the effects of food intake and oral health status on the general health and survival of old people have received little attention. Our previous studies suggest that most daily nutrient intakes (with some exceptions, e.g. folates) are related to socioeconomic and physical factors [12]. Furthermore, dental status is related m education, cognitive function and a global measure of somatic health represented by the health service utilization scale [13]. The relationships between dietary intake and dental status and effects on quality of life (QOL) and survival of old people have yet to be unravelled [10]. These are the reasons which prompted us to carry out the present analysis.
Subjects and methods
Sample and data collection
The target population was the entire cohort of 70-75-year-old subjects living in the historical centre of Brescia. All inhabitants in this area and living at home were considered eligible for inclusion (n = 1303). The study was carried out in two phases. During the first phase (February-June 1986), data collection was undertaken using a door-to-door method by 10 specifically trained doctors. Of the target population, 1189 subjects (91.3%) agreed to answer a multidimensional questionnaire and to undergo a standardized physical examination, including a comprehensive dental assessment. The reasons for exclusions were (i) refused interview (n = 27) and/or (ii) dental examination (n=12); (iii) out of town (n=65) or (iv) hospitalized (n=10) during the period of the inquiry. Gender distribution and mean age were no different between included and excluded subjects. Further details about this phase of the study have been reported previously [14, 15].
In the second phase of the study, the names of subjects who had died after 6 1/2 years were obtained from the government registry office. The survival status of 52 subjects (4.4% of the phase 1 sample) could not be ascertained (mainly because they had moved to a different town) and they were excluded. Thus, a final sample of 1137 elderly people (87.4% of the initial population) constituted the present study. Those lost to follow-up were not statistically different from the study sample in terms of age, sex, functional and mental or dental status (see below).
Questionnaire
Several baseline demographic variables were recorded using a self-report method: age, gender, educational level, marital status, economic situation and living conditions were documented (Table 1).
Table 1. Frequency distributions in the three subgroups
for baseline variables
Number (and %), by group(a)
Variable A (n = 287) B (n = 687) C (n = 163)
Gender
Male 96 (33.4) 227 (33.0) 48 (29.4)
Female 191 (66.6) 460 (67.0) 115 (70.6)
Education (years)
0-5 58 (20.2) 192 (27.9) 74 (45.4)(b,c)
[is greater than] 229 (79.8) 495 (72.1) 89 (54.6)
Marital status
Single 50 (17.4) 142 (20.7) 28 (17.2)(b)
Married 132 (46.0) 266 (38.7) 53 (32.5)
Widowed/divorced 105 (36.6) 279 (40.6) 82 (50.3)
Economic conditions
Satisfactory 69 (24.2) 142 (20.6) 40 (6.1)(b,c)
Sufficient 131 (45.6) 316 (45.9) 64 (39.3)
Insufficient 87 (30.2) 229 (33.4) 89 (54.6)
Living conditions
Alone 107 (37.3) 281 (40.9) 67 (41.1)
With other(s) 180 (62.7) 406 (59.1) 96 (58.9)
Motor activities
None 225 (78.4) 568 (82.7) 147 (90.2)
Occasional 49 (17.1) 97 (14.1) 15 (9.2)
Regular 13 (4.5) 22 (3.2) 1 (0.6)
Smoking
Yes 49 (17.1) 171 (24 9)(d) 28 (17.3)
No 183 (63.6) 375 (54.5) 104 (63.6)
Past 55 (19.2) 141 (20.6) 31 (19.1)
Variable [chi square] P-value
Gender
Male 0.9 0.640
Female
Education (years)
0-5 32.6 [is less than] 0.001
[is greater than]
Marital status
Single
Married 11.5 0.021
Widowed/divorced
Economic conditions
Satisfactory
Sufficient 42.2 [is less than] 0.001
Insufficient
Living conditions
Alone 1.2 0.549
With other(s)
Motor activities
None
Occasional 11.5 0.075
Regular
Smoking
Yes 8.8 0.012
No
Past
Brought to you by CBS MoneyWatch.com
- Best- and Worst-Paid College Degrees
- 6 Things You Should Never Do on Twitter or Facebook
- How Much Sleep Do You Really Need?
- 6 Big Myths about Gas Mileage
Most Recent Health Articles
Most Recent Health Publications
Most Popular Health Articles
- Make running easier: with this unique 'pose running' technique, you'll learn to actually enjoy your fat-burning sessions
- 50 home remedies that work: these safe, fast, and effective fixes will relieve what ails you - Cover Story
- Detox in 7 days: a detoux diet can help you shed up to 10 pounds and leave you feeling terrific. Our weeklong plan shows you how to lose the weight and keep it off - Cover story
- Treat sinusitis naturally: breath easy and relieve sinus pressure with these remedies - Quick Fixes and Long-Term Solutions
- All about nightshades: explore the hidden hazards of your favorite food with macrobiotic nutritionist Lino Stanchich



