Auto Industry
Industry: Email Alert RSS FeedWin some, lose some
Automotive Industries, Sept, 2004 by Bruno Lequesne, Richard L. May
I found the tone of your editorial to be entirely out of place in a supposedly technical magazine. Statements referring to John Kerry, such as "If spending 4 months and 12 days as a loose cannon ...," and "this supposed consummate diplomat," would be low enough in a tabloid. They do not belong in a magazine designed for professionals in a specific industry sector. Objectivity and neutrality should be the basis for your code of conduct.
The internet is full of low-level attacks of the sort, on both sides. I am sorry you saw it fit to scoop down to that low level, and to do it in such a one-sided way.
Most RecentAuto Articles
- Audi's sexy e-tron could be a Tesla Model S competitor, but not now
- Audi and Volkswagen Climbing a Steep Curve in the U.S.
- Skinny Detroit Auto Show Kicks Off a Tough Year for Budgets
- Tesla May Launch IPO, and Charging Networks Will Help
- First General Motors Loan Installment is Money in the Bank
- More »
Should one respond with, drinking alcohol for 20 years, and having no one remembering you while you 'served' in the national guard ... is a better qualification to understand the automotive industry? I am sorry you saw it fit to scoop down to that low level, and to do it in such a one-sided way. Keep to technical matters, please. Remember that your readership is diverse, actually. Not everyone is a republican. Or else, rename your magazine to say what you apparently think it should be, low-level political propaganda.
Bruno Lequesne
Rob Wilson's editorial in the August 2004 issue is outstanding. As no good deed goes unpunished, he will no doubt be pilloried on the stake of political correctness.
But until then, the fact that he comments negatively on know-nothing politicians whose only knowledge of science and engineering is spooning sugar into their coffee, is appreciated. They have been politicians so long that they forget that their empty oration does not impress Mother Nature and that hard work and individual initiative are needed to solve our energy-related problems. Maybe the politicians should threaten incarceration for engineers until they cause to happen whatever the latest politically correct drivel they are spouting.
The last three paragraphs of Wilson's editorial is probably the most succinct analysis of the possible directions of the solution to the energy problem. Get Wilson bodyguards. Anyone who talks as straight and sensibly as he does is in danger from the political establishment of the U.S.
Richard L. May
Brought to you by CBS MoneyWatch.com
- Best- and Worst-Paid College Degrees
- 6 Things You Should Never Do on Twitter or Facebook
- How Much Sleep Do You Really Need?
- 6 Big Myths about Gas Mileage
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with


