Food Industry
Industry: Email Alert RSS FeedWine, alcohol and health research: an in-depth look
Wines & Vines, May, 2003 by Elisabeth Holmgren
Every month, new, valid research findings on alcohol, health and social issues are being published in peer-reviewed journals. This is driven by the scientific community around the world, which is continuing investigations to resolve the many unanswered questions on exactly why sensible consumption may contribute to a positive lifestyle.
The most significant findings in recent months have focused on coronary heart disease (CHD). These data have emerged from leading U.S. studies, the Harvard Physicians Health Professionals Study and the Kaiser Permanente Cohort Study. New research conclusions have important clinical implications, as they look more closely at the importance of drinking patterns, beverage-specific findings and the best advice to the public.
Most RecentFood Articles
The scientific debate remains intriguing, as studies clearly find favorable effects from all beverages containing alcohol and point to some specific results for wine. The ongoing Copenhagen City Heart Study in Denmark takes the most comprehensive look at wine drinkers, their lifestyle habits and disease patterns.
The following outlines the most recent findings from these three cohorts and presents the data from the Danish cohort in more detail.
Recent Findings From U.S. Studies: Harvard University And Kaiser Permanente
The pattern of alcohol consumption, long thought to play a role in alcohol's reported association with reduced risk of heart disease, received strong statistical confirmation from the ongoing Harvard study on male health professionals. The recent data, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, shows that men who drank at least three and up to seven days a week reduced their risk of heart attack by nearly a third when compared to men who drank less than once a week. "The risk was similar among men who consumed less than l0g of alcohol per drinking day and those who consumed 30g or more. No single type of beverage conferred additional benefit, nor did consumption with meals," state lead author Dr. Kenneth J. Mukamal and colleagues. The researchers generally cautioned about the dangers of heavy drinking as well as the possible increased risk of breast cancer for women at even moderate levels.
Over the last decade, many Harvard University research studies have reported benefits among sensible drinkers with no significant beverage-specific differences. Dr. Eric Rimm from Harvard University published a review study in 1996 in the British Medical Journal that has been widely acknowledged among the research and public health community. He concluded, "Results from observational studies, where individual consumption can be assessed in detail and linked directly to coronary heart disease, provide strong evidence that a substantial proportion of benefits of wine, beer or spirits are attributable primarily to the alcohol content rather than to other components of each drink."
He also wrote, "Most of the differences in findings regarding specific drink types are probably due to differences in drinking patterns..." This position is reflected not only in findings from Harvard University but also in other U.S. cohorts such as the Framingham Heart, the American Cancer Society and the Kaiser Permanente studies.
The most comprehensive beverage-specific research in the U.S. is being conducted at Kaiser Permanente in Oakland, Calif., under the leadership of Dr. Arthur Klatsky, who has been a pioneer in alcohol and coronary heart disease research. He has published dozens of important articles on alcohol and health. At the recent American Heart Association (AHA) meeting, Klatsky released new findings on the relation between total alcohol intake and frequency (days/ week) of moderate wine (white and red), beer and spirits consumption to coronary heart disease mortality.
The official AHA abstract explains that all three beverages have CHD benefits but also states, "Drinkers of any type of wine have lower CHD mortality risk than beer or liquor drinkers, but it remains unclear whether this is due to nonalcoholic ingredients of wine, to drinking pattern or to associated traits." It is also discussed that the similar or slightly more pronounced effects of white wine compared to red wine make red wine phenolics an unlikely explanation for the different effects observed for moderate wine drinking preferrers.
Specifically, Klatsky found in this new study that those drinking wine daily had about a 25% lower risk of CHD death than did those who drank the same amount of beer and 35% less compared to those who drank comparable amounts of spirits. Klatsky and his colleagues published a 1990 study on the risk of CHD death and a 1997 study on the risk of CHD hospitalization, which found wine and beer drinkers had a lower CHD risk than spirits drinkers. This research pointing to benefits for all beverages and some unique findings for wine has been partly responsible for other in-depth research investigations around the globe.
The World's Most Prominent Wine-Specific Study: The Copenhagen Heart Study
Brought to you by CBS MoneyWatch.com
- Best- and Worst-Paid College Degrees
- 6 Things You Should Never Do on Twitter or Facebook
- How Much Sleep Do You Really Need?
- 6 Big Myths about Gas Mileage
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions



