Business Services Industry
Litigation - cost of litigation to US businesses - includes related articles - CE Roundtable - Panel Discussion
Chief Executive, The, Jan-Feb, 1995 by Lorri Grube
EDS insists its outside law firms sign an agreement that details what the company won't pay for, including first-class travel, Xeroxes, and overtime. Says Gilbert Freedlander, vice president and general counsel at EDS in Dallas: "Contract lawyers definitely have made outside counsel more competitive and responsive to business' needs."
RELATED ARTICLE: Courting Disaster
Congratulations! You've re-engineered your company by streamlining operations and reducing the work force. Profits are rebounding; Wall Street is happy.
It sounds good in theory - right up until a disgruntled former employee hauls you into court to fight a wrongful termination suit based on age, sex, race, or disability discrimination. The action may costs you hundreds of thousands of dollars. And downsizing companies aren't the only targets; virtually any organization is vulnerable.
According to Jury Verdict Research, a legal research and publishing firm in Horsham, PA, employees win about 60 percent of such cases that go to trial. In the old days, awards only included back pay, attorney fees, and court costs; now compensatory and punitive damages also may be levied because of combined common-law claims and changes in federal law.
"Disability cases especially can cost the employer dearly," says Robert J. Smith, a senior partner in Labor and Employment Law Section, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius in Washington. "The litigation involves medical experts, comparative accommodation and safety evidence, numerous depositions, and other pre-trial discovery. And that doesn't include the potentially significant sums in back pay and compensatory and punitive damages the company could be forced to pay."
Numbers in other wrongful termination cases are equally startling. Two former employees of Hughes Aircraft, a General Motors subsidiary, won an initial damage award of $89.5 million in October in a race bias case. The amount was later reduced. Richard Pietsch sued General Electric for age bias and received $1 million.
In light of this, what's a company to do? "Surprised employees are vindictive employees," says John E. Lyncheski, chair of Pittsburgh-based law firm Cohen and Grigsby's Labor and Employment Practice. "Communicate what's going to happen to them and consider offering severance packages attractive enough to forgo litigation."
Smith adds that companies should fully document why employees were laid off or fired and ensure that voluntary incentive programs used in downsizing efforts are, in fact, voluntary. There's no magic bullet, he says. If diligent, however, companies that effectively plan in advance of these actions can stay in control - and out of court.
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions


