Financial Services Industry
Industry: Email Alert RSS FeedIndustrial Production and Capacity Utilization for February 1999
Federal Reserve Bulletin, April, 1999
Released for publication March 16
Industrial production increased 0.2 percent in February. Mining production rose 0.4 percent, the first increase in a year, while production at utilities decreased 0.6 percent. Manufacturing output increased 0.2 percent, the fifth consecutive month of increase in that industry group. At 132.6 percent of its 1992 average, industrial production in February was 1.9 percent higher than it had been in February 1998. Overall capacity utilization in February slipped 0.1 percentage point, to 80.3 percent, a level 1 3/4 percentage points below its long-term average and 2 1/4 percentage points below its February 1998 level.
MARKET GROUPS
Most PopularCBS MoneyWatch.com Articles
The output of durable consumer goods increased 0.9 percent, a rise buoyed by large increases in the production of appliances and home electronics. In contrast, the production of automotive products edged down 0.1 percent after a strong gain in January. The output of nondurable consumer goods excluding energy decreased for the third consecutive month; part of the decline is attributable to softness for clothing and paper products. The output of consumer energy products, which has been volatile recently, fell 1.1 percent, reversing only part of the 2.8 percent gain in January.
The production of business equipment increased 0.2 percent after having been flat in January. Declines in the output of industrial equipment and transit equipment were more than offset by gains in information processing equipment and other equipment. The gain in the other equipment group resulted from a jump in farm equipment, although output of the latter remains below its level in the first half of 1998. The output of construction supplies edged down 0.1 percent after four consecutive months of increases. The production of business supplies was flat.
A strong increase in the production of semiconductors contributed to the 0.6 percent increase in the production of durable goods materials. The output of basic metals fell 0.1 percent, and the level of production remained more than 6 percent less than in February 1998. The production of nondurable materials slipped 0.3 percent, a decline reflecting weakness in chemicals and paper materials. The production of energy materials edged up 0.2 percent.
INDUSTRY GROUPS
Manufacturing output grew 0.2 percent, with a 1/2 percent gain in the production of durable goods and a slight pullback in the production of nondurable goods. Durable goods industries that posted increases in production included furniture and fixtures, industrial machinery, electrical machinery, and instruments. Those in which output fell included lumber; aircraft, which continued to edge down from the very high level achieved last year; and motor vehicles and parts, which slipped again although remaining at a high level. The production of nondurable goods edged down 0.2 percent after having declined 0.1 percent in January. Losses were widespread; gains were posted in tobacco products, chemicals, and rubber and plastic products. Mining production increased, as gains in coal output outweighed losses elsewhere.
The factory operating rate slid 0.1 percentage point, to 79.5 percent--2 1/4 percentage points below the level of February 1998. The utilization rate for advanced-processing industries inched down just 0.1 percentage point, while the utilization rate for primary-processing industries fell 0.4 percentage point. The utilization rate for mines edged up 0.2 percentage point but remained well below its long-term average. Temperatures were relatively warm, as has been the case all winter, and the operating rate for utilities dipped to 89.8 percent.
NOTICE
The capacity estimates in this month's release incorporate a small change in the method used to interpolate the annual estimates of capacity growth to the monthly frequency. The previous monthly capacity figures were computed assuming that capacity growth is constant from the beginning of a year to the end, with potentially abrupt changes in growth rates between the last months of one year and the first months of the next. The new procedure allows capacity growth rates to change smoothly over time; it has been applied to data beginning with October 1998. At the most detailed industry level, the new capacity estimates maintain the same fourth quarter over fourth quarter growth rates that were calculated under the previous procedure. Table 4 now shows fourth quarter over fourth quarter growth rates instead of December over December rates.
[CHART OMITTED]
Industrial production and capacity utilization, February 1999
Industrial production, index, 1992 = 100
Category 1998 1999
Nov.(r) Dec.(r) Jan.(r) Feb.(p)
Total 132.2 132.4 132.4 132.6
Previous estimate 132.3 132.5 132.5 ...
Major market groups
Products, total(2) 124.5 124.4 124.5 124.5
Consumer goods 114.8 115.0 115.1 115.1
Business equipment 168.1 167.5 167.5 167.8
Construction supplies 129.6 131.1 131.6 131.5
Materials 144.6 145.3 145.2 145.7
Major industry groups
Manufacturing 136.4 136.6 136.7 136.9
Durable 161.0 161.2 161.5 162.3
Nondurable 111.6 111.7 1116.0 111.4
Mining 101.1 100.0 97.0 97.4
Utilities 110.6 112.5 114.6 114.0
Industrial production, index, 1992 = 100
Percentage change
Category
1998(1) 1999(1)
Nov.(r) Dec.(r) Jan.(r) Feb.(P)
Total -.2 .2 .0 .2
Previous estimate -.1 .2 .0 ...
Major market groups
Products, total(2) -.3 .0 .0 .0
Consumer goods -.4 .2 .1 .0
Business equipment -.6 -.3 .0 .2
Construction supplies .9 .1 .4 -.1
Materials .1 .4 .0 .3
Major industry groups
Manufacturing .2 .1 .1 .2
Durable -.1 .2 .2 .5
Nondurable .7 -.1 -.1 -.2
Mining -.9 -1.0 -3.0 .4
Utilities -5.1 1.7 1.9 -.6
Percentage change
Category
Feb. 1998 to
Feb. 1999
Total 1.9
Previous estimate ...
Major market groups
Products, total(2) 1.7
Consumer goods -.2
Business equipment 6.9
Construction supplies 4.6
Materials 2.2
Major industry groups
Manufacturing 2.4
Durable 5.4
Nondurable -1.2
Mining -9.4
Utilities 4.5
Capacity utilization, percent
Average, Low, High, 1998 1998
1967-98 1982 1988-89
Feb. Nov.(r)
Total 82.1 71.1 85.4 82.6 80.8
Previous estimate 80.9
Manufacturing 81.1 69.0 85.7 81.8 80.1
Advanced processing 80.5 70.4 84.2 807.0 79.4
Primary processing 82.4 66.2 88.9 847.0 82.4
Mining 87.5 80.3 88.0 899.0 83.8
Utilities 87.4 75.9 92.6 86.6 87.3
Capacity utilization, percent
Memo
Capacity,
1998 1999 percentage
change,
Feb. 1998
to
Dec. (r) Jan.(r) Feb.(p) Feb. 1999
Total 80.7 80.4 80.3 4.8
Previous estimate 80.8 80.5 ... ...
Manufacturing 79.9 79.6 79.5 5.3
Advanced processing 78.9 78.5 78.4 6.4
Primary processing 82.8 83.0 82.6 2.7
Mining 82.9 80.3 80.5 1.1
Utilities 88.7 90.4 89.8 .8
- How to choose the right insurance carrier for your business
- Real Estate: Prepare your properties to weather what lies ahead
- Technology: Be prepared if part of your global supply chain goes missing
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions
- Using object-oriented analysis and design over traditional structured analysis and design


