Financial Services Industry
Industry: Email Alert RSS FeedBanking Relationships of Lower-Income Families and the Governmental Trend toward Electronic Payment - includes related articles - Statistical Data Included
Federal Reserve Bulletin, July, 1999 by Jeanne M. Hogarth, Kevin H. O'Donnell
In the past three years, the federal government and many states have lowered their costs of administering welfare and benefits programs by expanding the use of electronic payment. These initiatives promise to have their greatest significance, and meet their greatest challenge, among lower-income families, the demographic group with the lowest rate of bank account ownership and the least familiarity with electronic transactions.
Most PopularCBS MoneyWatch.com Articles
Although the payment programs do not require a banking relationship, the move to electronic transfer could change the financial practices of many recipients without a deposit account or with no banking relationship at all. Recipients of social security and other benefits payments who do not have a checking account may well continue to obtain cash and other financial services from alternative service providers, such as check cashing outlets and grocery stores. But in light of the increased promotion of direct deposit, many of these recipients may be more inclined to open a deposit account. The attraction of a bank account for some families without one may become heightened as governments and the payment system in general move more toward electronic transactions. An example of such a move is the federal government's introduction this summer of special accounts to be made available at depository institutions primarily for the transfer of federal payments.
In these ways, the governmental move to electronic payment may do more than the "basic banking" effort of the 1980s to spread the use of bank accounts to "unbanked" families. Moreover, the greater use of the banking system by these families could harmonize with the emphasis that welfare reform has placed on asset-building for lower-income families, a goal that may be harder to achieve without the use of a bank account. On the other hand, a move by greater numbers of lower-income families into the mainstream of the payment system is likely to be a difficult transition for many of them, given survey results on why they do not currently use the banking system.
This article examines the ways in which lower-income families obtain checking and credit services, the effects that the government move to electronic payment may have on these families and on depository institutions, and the promotional and educational efforts that may be needed to facilitate the move to electronic services.
OWNERSHIP OF TRANSACTION ACCOUNTS AND USE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
According to the Federal Reserve Board's Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF), about 87 percent of all U.S. families in 1995 had a transaction account at a financial institution.(1) Most of these (85 percent of all families) had a checking account, and 36 percent of all families had a savings account (table 1; also see box "Account Ownership over Time").(2)
1. Ownership of transaction accounts and other financial products, 1995
Percent
All U.S. Lower-income Product families families Transaction account Either checking or savings 87.4 75.8 Checking 85.0 72.1 Savings 36.0 25.4 Both checking and savings 33.5 21.5 Credit Major credit card(1) 66.5 44.6 Loan Vehicle 30.8 18.6 Education 11.8 10.6 Consumer 14.2 13.5 Mortgage(2) First 38.7 18.1 Second 3.4 1.4 Home equity line of credit 11.0 4.3 MEMO: Owns home 64.7 49.6 Savings and investments Certificate of deposit 14.3 12.9 Savings bonds 22.8 10.6 IRA or Keogh account 26.1 12.1 Mutual fund 12.3 4.2 Stocks 15.2 6.7 Bonds 3.1 .6 Annuities 3.2 2.1 Life insurance(3) Any 71.9 55.0 Term 76.0 71.0 Whole life 44.4 40.1 Both term and whole life 20.4 11.1
NOTE. Data in this and other tables in this article are from the 1995 Survey of Consumer Finances except as noted. For details and definition of lower income, see text and appendix A. For definition of transaction account and depository institution, see text note 2.
(1.) Discover, MasterCard, Optima, and Visa.
(2.) On primary residence.
(3.) Percentages of respondents holding particular types are for those owning life insurance.
IRA Individual Retirement Account.
Use of Financial Services by Lower-Income Families
The median income of the 100 million families in the United States (including single-person households) for the year preceding the 1995 SCF was roughly $32,000. At the threshold commonly used to define low to moderate income (80 percent of median income), approximately 45 percent of U.S. families in 1995, or about 45 million families, were in that category (hereafter referred to as lower income; see box "Some Characteristics of Low- to Moderate-Income Families" and appendix A).(3)
Brought to you by CBS MoneyWatch.com
- Best- and Worst-Paid College Degrees
- 6 Things You Should Never Do on Twitter or Facebook
- How Much Sleep Do You Really Need?
- 6 Big Myths about Gas Mileage
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics


