Health Care Industry
Industry: Email Alert RSS FeedPatient turnover and nursing staff adequacy
Health Services Research, April, 2006 by Lynn Y. Unruh, Myron D. Fottler
Table 1: Average Patient Length of Stay, Patient Turnover,
Turnover Indices, Severity, and Severity Index in Pennsylvania
Hospitals 1994-2001
1994 1995 1996 1997
Average patient length of stay
Mean 6.32 5.96 5.67 5.50
Standard deviation 1.67 2.23 2.21 1.90
% [DELTA] from prior year -- -4.46 -5.04 -2.41
Patient turnover
Mean 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.19
Standard deviation 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04
% [DELTA] from prior year -- 6.97 6.05 2.98
Turnover index 1 *
Mean 1.00 1.07 1.14 1.18
Standard deviation 0 0.10 0.13 0.17
% [DELTA] from prior year -- 6.97 6.27 2.98
Turnover index 2 ([dagger])
Mean 1.00 1.04 1.07 1.08
Standard deviation 0 0.04 0.05 0.07
% [DELTA] from prior year -- 3.56 2.96 1.37
Patient severity score
Mean 1.12 1.15 1.11 1.17
Standard deviation 0.22 0.25 0.25 0.27
% [DELTA] from prior year -- 2.82 -1.86 8.75
Severity index
Mean 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.07
Standard deviation 0 0.13 0.16 0.32
% [DELTA] from prior year -- 2.78 -1.77 8.61
% [DELTA]
1998 1999 2000 2001 1994-2001
Average patient length of stay
Mean 5.26 0.50 4.90 4.87 --
Standard deviation 2.00 2.03 1.04 0.97 --
% [DELTA] from prior year -4.16 -2.47 -1.88 -1.73 -20.84
Patient turnover
Mean 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.22 --
Standard deviation 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 --
% [DELTA] from prior year 4.73 1.45 2.65 2.42 29.43
Turnover index 1 *
Mean 1.23 1.24 1.28 1.29 --
Standard deviation 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.19 --
% [DELTA] from prior year 4.70 1.34 3.24 1.20 29.43
Turnover index 2 ([dagger])
Mean 1.11 1.11 1.13 1.13 --
Standard deviation 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 --
% [DELTA] from prior year 2.33 0.69 1.40 0.23 13.26
Patient severity score
Mean 1.39 1.40 1.32 1.23 --
Standard deviation 0.21 0.23 0.22 0.19 --
% [DELTA] from prior year 23.56 1.04 -5.49 -6.11 9.8
Severity index
Mean 1.31 1.31 1.25 1.16 --
Standard deviation 0.56 0.57 0.51 0.49 --
% [DELTA] from prior year 23.70 0.99 -5.56 -6.16 15.66
* Turnover index 1 uses 1 /LOS.
([dagger]) Turnover index 2 uses square root (1/LOS).
Table 2: RN/1,000 APDC in Pennsylvania Hospitals 1994-2001,
before and after Adjustment for Patient Turnover and Severity
1994 1995 1996 1997
Before adjustment
RN/1,000 APDC 2.84 2.88 2.94 2.92
After adjustment for patient turnover ([dagger])
RN/1,000
APDC (adj) 2.84 2.75 2.65 2.54
Mean difference 0 -0.14 -0.29 -0.37
t-Value -- -3.00 * -5.82 *** -8.11 ***
After adjustment for patient turnover ([double dagger])
RN/1,000
APDC (adj) 2.84 2.80 2.78 2.71
Mean difference 0 -0.10 -0.18 -0.22
t-Value -- -12.45 *** -14.66 *** -17.18 ***
After adjustment for patient turnover ([dagger]) and severity
RN/1,000
APDC (adj) 2.86 2.71 2.71 2.51
Mean difference 0 -0.19 -0.23 -0.41
t-Value -- -3.43 *** -4.18 *** -6.92 ***
After adjustment for patient turnover ([double dagger]) and severity
RN/1,000
APDC (adj) 2.86 2.75 2.81 2.68
Mean difference 0 -0.14 -0.11 -0.25
t-Value -- -5.31 *** -3.42 *** -5.39 ***
1998 1999 2000 2001
Before adjustment
RN/1,000 APDC 2.89 2.88 2.86 2.81
After adjustment for patient turnover ([dagger])
RN/1,000
APDC (adj) 2.43 2.37 2.29 2.26
Mean difference -0.47 -0.51 -0.6 -0.62
t-Value -8.64 *** -11.14 *** -20.17 *** -23.21 ***
After adjustment for patient turnover ([double dagger])
RN/1,000
APDC (adj) 2.63 2.61 2.58 2.56
Mean difference -0.28 -0.29 -0.32 -0.33
t-Value -19.47 *** -18.75 *** -20.18 *** -22.60 ***
After adjustment for patient turnover ([dagger]) and severity
RN/1,000
APDC (adj) 1.96 1.93 1.20 2.09
Mean difference -0.95 -0.98 -0.92 -0.8
t-Value -23.68 *** -24.46 *** -21.61 *** -20.44 ***
After adjustment for patient turnover ([double dagger]) and severity
RN/1,000
APDC (adj) 2.16 2.23 2.28 2.43
Mean difference -0.75 -0.81 -0.68 -0.56
t-Value -20.86 *** -16.60 *** -18.33 *** -12.40 ***
* p < .01.
** p < .001.
*** p < .0001.
([dagger]) Turnover adjustment 1 uses 1/LOS.
([double dagger]) Turnover adjustment 2 uses square root(1/LOS).
Table 3: Percentage Change in RN/1,000 APDC in Pennsylvania Hospitals
1994-2001, before and after Adjustment for Patient Turnover and Severity
1994-5 1995-6 1996-7 1997-8
Before adjustment
RN/1,000 APDC 2.25 1.61 -0.27 -0.58
After adjustment for patient turnover ([dagger])
RN/1,000
APDC (adj) -3.98 -3.77 -1.78 -3.56
Mean difference -6.54 -5.48 -1.47 -3.26
t-Value -13.13 *** -10.65 *** -4.69 *** -8.57 ***
After adjustment for patient turnover ([double dagger])
RN/1,000
APDC (adj) -0.97 -0.68 -1.23 -1.58
Mean difference -3.33 -2.86 -1.25 -1.23
t-Value -13.19 *** -10.95 *** -4.79 *** -8.82 ***
After adjustment for patient turnovers and severity
RN/1,000
APDC (adj) -6.02 0.04 -7.07 -17.69
Mean difference -8.57 -1.25 -7.04 -17.71
t-Value -9.43 *** -1.04 -6.21 ** -14.36 ***
After adjustment for patient turnovers and severity
RN/1,000
APDC (adj) -2.24 3.35 -4.87 -15.95
Mean difference -4.77 1.58 -5.16 -15.77
t-Value -4.58 *** 1.33 -5.35 *** -13.68 ***
1998-9 1999-00 2000-01 1994-01
Before adjustment
RN/1,000 APDC -0.17 -1.86 -2.09 -1.26
After adjustment for patient turnover ([dagger])
RN/1,000
APDC (adj) -1.47 -3.58 -1.31 -20.23
Mean difference -1.1 -2.24 0.66 -19.51
t-Value -2.20 * -4.53 *** 1.34 -23.84 ***
After adjustment for patient turnover ([double dagger])
RN/1,000
APDC (adj) -0.23 -2.30 -0.73 -10.41
Mean difference -0.65 -1.11 1.31 -9.51
t-Value -2.78 ** -4.61 *** 1.32 -23.07 ***
After adjustment for patient turnovers and severity
RN/1,000
APDC (adj) -1.30 2.13 5.95 -26.49
Mean difference -1.09 3.59 6.14 -25.97
t-Value -3.11 ** 5.17 *** 7.84 *** -20.35 ***
After adjustment for patient turnovers and severity
RN/1,000
APDC (adj) -0.51 2.98 6.30 -16.50
Mean difference -0.42 4.82 6.52 -15.55
t-Value -2.57 8.99 *** 11.03 *** -14.13 ***
* p < .01.
** p < .001.
*** p < .0001.
([dagger]) Turnover adjustment 1 uses 1/LOS.
([double dagger]) Turnover adjustment 2 uses square root(1/LOS).
Table 4: Comparison of Study Findings to Graf et al. (2003) Case Study
Turnover Turnover
Graf et al. Adjustment 1 Adjustment 2
(2003) (%) (1/LOS) (%) Sqrt (1/LOS) (%)
Percent 22 21 21
change in LOS
Percent 19 20 10
change RN
staffing
or workload
Increase 90 95 48
in RN staffing
as a proportion
of increase in
length of stay
Turnover Turnover
Adjustment 1 Adjustment 2
and Severity (%) and Severity (%)
Percent 21 21
change in LOS
Percent 26 16
change RN
staffing
or workload
Increase 124 76
in RN staffing
as a proportion
of increase in
length of stay
Sqrt, square root.
More Articles of Interest
COPYRIGHT 2006 Health Research and Educational Trust
COPYRIGHT 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning
- How to choose the right insurance carrier for your business
- Real Estate: Prepare your properties to weather what lies ahead
- Technology: Be prepared if part of your global supply chain goes missing
Most Recent Health Articles
Most Recent Health Publications
Most Popular Health Articles
- 50 home remedies that work: these safe, fast, and effective fixes will relieve what ails you - Cover Story
- Detox in 7 days: a detoux diet can help you shed up to 10 pounds and leave you feeling terrific. Our weeklong plan shows you how to lose the weight and keep it off - Cover story
- Treat sinusitis naturally: breath easy and relieve sinus pressure with these remedies - Quick Fixes and Long-Term Solutions
- All about nightshades: explore the hidden hazards of your favorite food with macrobiotic nutritionist Lino Stanchich
- La anemia falciforme - causas y tratamiento



