Business Services Industry
Policy statement issued on internal auditing - Update
Internal Auditor, April, 2003 by J. Swauger
U.S. FEDERAL BANKING and thrift regulatory agencies joined together on March 17 to issue a new policy statement on internal auditing. The Interagency Policy Statement on the Internal Audit Function and its Outsourcing includes discussion of internal audit reporting relationships, audit outsourcing, responsibility for internal controls, internal audit standards, audit independence, and other issues important to internal auditors.
The new policy -- issued jointly by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Office of Thrift Supervision -- encourages financial institutions to evaluate their internal controls against The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (Coso) framework if they are not already doing so. It states that the board of directors and senior management are responsible for ensuring that the system of internal control operates effectively and indicates that this responsibility cannot be delegated to others within the institution or to outside parties.
Although the policy limits outsourcing arrangements, it recognizes that some outsourcing may be appropriate and gives specific considerations for internal audit outsourcing arrangements.
Reflecting provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the interagency policy extends some provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley to financial organizations that are not publicly listed companies. For example, the new policy encourages financial institutions to refrain from outsourcing internal audit activities to their external auditor, even if they are not required to do so by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
According to the new document, directors should be confident that the internal audit function addresses the risks and meets the demands posed by current and planned activities. To accomplish this objective, the policy states that directors should "consider whether their institution's internal audit activities are conducted in accordance with professional standards such as The IIA's Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing," and they should oversee the internal audit function and evaluate its performance.
Although various types of reporting relationships are permissible for internal auditors under the new policy, the ideal organizational arrangement for the chief audit executive is said to be direct reporting solely to the audit committee regarding both audit issues and administrative matters. The policy encourages financial institutions to consider The IIA's Practice Advisory 2060-2 on relationships between internal auditors and the audit committee.
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions


