Study on the impact of buildings on the outdoor thermal environment based on a coupled simulation of convection, radiation, and conduction
ASHRAE Transactions, July, 2007 by Hong Chen, Ryozo Ooka, Hong Huang, Madoka Nakashima
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]
Comparison of Sensible Heat Flux Volumes from Each Building Wall. Table 3 shows the mean surface temperature of each wall and the amount of sensible heat flux from the building walls in Case 1. The total amount of sensible heat flux from the walls of one building is 263.31 kW, and these values are of almost the same order as for artificial heat release (378 kW) from the same building.
Table 3. Mean Surface Temperature of Each Wall and the Amount
of Sensible Heat Flux from the Building Walls
North South East West Rooftop
Mean surface 34.53 36.59 34.48 52.38 52.39
temperature,
[degrees]C
Mean surface
temperature,
[degrees]C
(by the
Monte
Carlo method
[Yoshida et
al. 2000b]) 35.40 37.70 35.60 53.00 --
Sensible heat 6.59 19.81 13.13 108.44 115.34
flux, kW
Entire Artificial
Heat
Building Release
Walls
Mean surface
temperature,
[degrees]C
Mean surface
temperature,
[degrees]C
(by the
Monte
Carlo method
[Yoshida et
al. 2000b])
Sensible heat 263.31 378 (Case
flux, kW 2)
Impact Factor Indices. Table 4 shows the mean impact factor index of each building wall and artificial heat release (i.e., the average value within canyon spaces of 30 m height). The horizontal and vertical distributions of the impact factor index of all building walls and the artificial heat release from the buildings are shown in Figures 8 and 9, respectively. For the impact factor index of the building walls, compared to Case 1, the impact factor index of the west wall and rooftop demonstrate an increase in Case 4. In the three cases where artificial heat release is considered (Cases 2, 3, and 5), the impact factor index for the artificial heat release in Case 3 is the largest. The impact factor index for artificial heat release in Case 2 is -0.032[degrees]C, and this is thought to be due to the cool air in the upper region flowing into the dwelling region because of mixing between the upper and bottom regions that occurs as described above. The impact factor index for the artificial heat release in Case 5 is 0.354[degrees]C in the vicinity of the ground (height 1.5 m), and this is about 40% of the impact factor index in Case 3, where artificial heat is released from the ground. This is thought to be due to the artificial heat released from the rooftop flowing into the canyon space due to the circulatory flow caused by the heterogeneous building block configuration. The impact factor index for all building walls shows a very large value (0.888[degrees]C) in Case 4, indicating that the total influence of all the building walls depends on the configuration of the building block.
Table 4. Mean Impact Factor Index [[degrees]C]
Plan A-A' B-B'
Section Section
North 0.012 0.027 0.007
South 0.027 0.062 0.019
Middle-Rise East 0.042 0.050 0.027
Building Block West 0.088 0.078 0.137
(Case 1) Rooftop 0.083 0.200 0.081
Total walls 0.252 0.417 0.270
North 0.035 0.034 0.030
South 0.093 0.098 0.083
Heterogeneous East 0.074 0.049 0.053
Mixed Block West 0.342 0.278 0.312
(Case 4) Rooftop 0.344 0.428 0 400
Total walls 0.888 0.888 0.878
Case 2 -0.032 0.095 0.004
Artificial Case 3 0.863 2.078 0.476
Heat Release Case 5 0.354 0.805 0.716
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions



