Mitigation measures in analyses under the National Environmental Policy Act
Army Lawyer, Sept, 2002
46 Fed. Reg. 18,026.
(9.) 67 Fed. Reg. 15,290 (2002) (to be codified at 32 C.F.R pt. 651).
(10.) See id. at 15,305 (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. [section] 651.15(a)(1)-(5)).
(11.) Id. at 15,327 (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. pt. 651, app. C(c)(1)).
(12.) Id. (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. pt. 651, app. C(c)(2)).
(13.) Id. (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. pt. 651, app. C(c)(3)).
(14.) Id. (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. pt. 651, app. C(c)(4)).
(15.) Id. at 15,306 (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. [section] 651.15(b)).
(16.) Id.
(17.) Id. (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. [section] 651.15(c)).
(18.) Id. (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. [section] 651.15(d)). This section of the regulation states:
A number of factors determine what is practical, including military mission, manpower restrictions, cost, institutional barriers, technical feasibility, and public acceptance. Practicality does not necessarily ensure resolution of conflicts among these items, rather it is the degree of conflict that determines practicality. Although mission conflicts are inevitable, they are not necessarily insurmountable; and the proponent should be cautious about declaring all mitigations impractical and carefully consider any manpower requirements.
Id.
(19.) Id.
(20.) 40 C.F.R. [section] 1508.2(c) (LEXIS 2002).
(21.) Id. [section] 1503.
(22.) 67 Fed. Reg. 15,306 (2002) (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. [section] 651.15(h)); id. at 15,327 (to be codified at 32 C.F.R pt. 651, app. C(d)).
(23.) Id. at 15,306 (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. [section] 651.15(h)(1)); id. at 15,327 (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. pt. 651, app. C(d)(1)).
(24.) Id. at 15,306 (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. [section] 651.15(h)(2)); id. at 15,327 (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. pt., app. C(d)(2)).
(25.) Id. at 15,306 (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. [section] 651.15(h)(3)); id. at 15,327 (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. pt. 651, app. C(d)(3)).
(26.) Id. at 15,306 (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. [section] 651.15(h)(4)); id. at 15,327 (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. pt. 651, app. C(d)(4)). The paragraph at Appendix C states that important cases include:
(4) Failure of a mitigation measure, or other unforeseen circumstances, could result in serious harm to federal-or state-listed endangered or threatened species; important historic or archaeological sites that are either on, or meet eligibility requirements for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places; wilderness areas, wild and scenic rivers, or other public or private protected resources. Evaluation and determination of what constitutes serious harm must be made in coordination with the appropriate federal, state, or local agency responsible for each particular program.
Id.
(27.) Id. (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. [section] 651.15(i)(1)).
(28.) Id. (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. [section] 651.15(i)(2)).
(29.) Id. (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. [section] 651.15(i)(1)).
(30.) Id. (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. [section] 651.15(i)(2)).
(31.) Id.
(32.) Id. at 15,327 (to be codified at 32 C.F.R. pt. 651, app. C(g)). This paragraph states:
Most Recent Reference Articles
- ARAB EUROPEAN RELATIONS - Dec 22 - Russia Denies Selling Missile System To Iran
- EGYPT - Dec 29 - Opposition Says Mubarak Blessed Israeli Attacks
- ARAB AFFAIRS - Dec 22 - Syria Will Eventually Move To Direct Talks With Israel
- ARAB AFFAIRS - Dec 30 - GCC Denounces Massacre
- ARAB ISRAELI RELATIONS - Israel Issues An Appeal To Palestinians In Gaza
Most Recent Reference Publications
Most Popular Reference Articles
- Credit card debt on college campuses: causes, consequences, and solutions
- The Greek chorus, Jimmy the Greek got it wrong but so did his critics - Jimmy Snyder and his views on pro sports and race
- How Tyler Perry rose from homelessness to a $5 million mansion
- 9 questions to ask your new lover: what you were afraid to ask, but always wanted to know
- Living by the word: light the candles


