Stull, Stull & Brody Announces Class Action Against Merrill Lynch On Behalf Of Purchasers Of Merrill Lynch's Internet Holdrs Depository Receipts
Market Wire, 20050229
Notice is hereby given that a class action lawsuit was filed on August 19, 2002 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, on behalf of purchasers of Merrill Lynch Internet HOLDRS depository receipts ("Internet HOLDRS") issued by the Merrill Lynch Internet HOLDRS/(SM) Trust (the "Trust") (AMEX:HHH) between September 22, 1999 and April 26, 2002, inclusive (the "Class Period") against defendants Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith (together, "Merrill Lynch"), the Trust and signatories of the Registration Statement and Prospectus (together, the "Prospectus") issued on behalf of the Trust.
The complaint alleges that defendants violated Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 by issuing a series of false and misleading statements, and omissions of material fact in the Registration Statement, which included a Prospectus, issued in connection with the initial public offering of the Internet HOLDRS depository receipts. The Internet HOLDRS depository receipts are "basket securities." Each Internet HOLDRS depository receipt represents an undivided beneficial ownership in the Internet companies specified in the Prospectus (the "Underlying Securities"). Thus, the price of the Internet HOLDRS is directly related to and moved with the price of the Underlying Securities. As alleged, the Prospectus was false and misleading and/or failed to disclose certain information concerning the Underlying Securities. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the Prospectus failed to disclose that during the Class Period the stock prices of Internet companies covered by Merrill Lynch, which included many of the Underlying Securities, were artificially inflated as a result of Merrill Lynch's analyst reports and stock ratings that did not set forth the true opinions held by those analysts of the subject Internet companies. Also alleged not to have been disclosed in the Prospectus is that Merrill Lynch's Internet group analysts, often under pressure from the Merrill Lynch's investment bankers, were initiating, continuing and/or manipulating research coverage to maintain and attract investment banking business. The complaint's allegations are based, in part, on information from the investigation of Merrill Lynch and its Internet group analysts conducted by the New York State Attorney General.
If you purchased Internet HOLDRS stock between September 22, 1999 and April 26, 2002, inclusive, you may, no later than September 24, 2002, request the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff.
Alead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the Court must determine that the class member's claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that the class member will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as "lead plaintiff." Your ability to share in any recovery is not, however, affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain Stull, Stull & Brody, or other counsel of your choice, to serve as your counsel in this action.
If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Tzivia Brody, Esq. at Stull, Stull & Brody by calling toll-free 1-800-337-4983, or by e-mail at SSBNY@aol.com, or by fax at 212/490-2022, or by writing to Stull, Stull & Brody, 6 East 45th Street, New York, NY 10017.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Most Recent Business Articles
- Psyadon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Announces Regulatory Milestones and the Initiation of a Clinical Trial of Ecopipam in Lesch-Nyhan Disease
- Emergence of “Femtomedicine” - New Frontier of Biomed Sciences - Reported at First Global Congress on Nano Medicine
- Research and Markets: Ethiopia Power Market Outlook to 2020
- Research and Markets: Orphan Drugs in Asia-Pacific: from Designation to Pricing, Funding & Market Access
- Research and Markets: Now You See It - TV Program Sponsorship & Product Placement in China
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FHM Features Anna Benson, Baseball's Hottest Wife
- Building a DNA database: the federal government has just enacted two bills related to DNA. The first would drive the collection of DNA from all infants. The second would attempt to prevent the DNA that is collected from being misused
- America's most wanted j-o-b-s - 10 hottest employment opportunities
- Developmental sequence in small groups


