Court Grants Preliminary Approval of $33 Million Gender Class Action Settlement With Smith Barney
Market Wire, May, 2008
Late yesterday, a federal court granted preliminary approval of a $33 million settlement with Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. d/b/a Smith Barney, on behalf of all women employed as Financial Advisors in (i) the United States branches of Smith Barney's retail brokerage division at any time from August 24, 2003 through March 1, 2008 or (ii) the California branches of Smith Barney's retail brokerage division at any time from June 25, 2003 through March 1, 2008. Plaintiffs alleged that Smith Barney discriminated against female Financial Advisors in compensation and business opportunities.
The parties entered into a four-year settlement agreement that received preliminary Court approval yesterday. It includes comprehensive injunctive relief regarding compensation, account distribution policies, partnership arrangements, branch manager promotions, retention, diversity training, and complaint processing, among other things. The settlement calls for the appointment of an independent Diversity Monitor and an independent Industrial Psychologist to effectuate the terms of the Agreement. In addition, the settlement establishes a class monetary fund of $33 million, plus interest as of December 15, 2007. A Claims Administrator is expected to determine the allocation of monies among class members.
Adam Klein stated, "We are pleased that the Court took the next step in the settlement process."
Cyrus Mehri explained, "The programmatic relief in this agreement will level the playing field for distribution of business opportunities going forward. We are very proud of our named plaintiffs for being catalysts for change."
"The court order is a positive step for the plaintiffs and the class," said Kelly M. Dermody, a partner in Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Co-Lead Class Counsel.
The settlement was the result of intensive negotiations supervised by experienced neutral mediator Hunter Hughes, Esq., of Atlanta, Georgia.
The four law firms representing plaintiffs are Outten & Golden, LLP, Mehri & Skalet, PLLC, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP and Altshuler Berzon, LLP.
Reporters seeking further information or a copy of the complaint should contact Devi Chandrasekaran at dchandrasekaran@findjustice.com .
Contact: Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel: Adam T. Klein Outten & Golden, LLP (212) 245-1000 Kelly M. Dermody Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP (415) 956-1000 Cyrus Mehri Mehri & Skalet, PLLC (202) 822-5100
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics



