Crosshair Delivers Significant Growth to Upper C Zone Uranium Resource and Defines New Resources
Market Wire, August, 2008
Crosshair Exploration & Mining Corp. (TSX: CXX)(AMEX: CXZ) is pleased to announce the results of the updated independent NI 43-101 resource estimate on the C Zone and two new areas at its Central Mineral Belt (CMB) Uranium Project in Labrador.
The updated estimates include an indicated resource of 5.19 million pounds of uranium (U3O8) and additional inferred resources of 5.82 million pounds of U3O8 (see below for tonnage and grade details). The indicated resource is contained wholly within the Upper C Zone, while the inferred resource estimate includes resources from the Lower C Zone (1.60 million pounds), Area 1 (0.48 million pounds), and Armstrong (0.90 million pounds).
In addition to increasing the uranium resource, the vanadium resource has also been significantly increased to 11.75 million pounds of vanadium (V2O5) in the indicated category and an additional 15.81 million pounds of V2O5 in the inferred category. It should be noted that the vanadium resource estimate only includes vanadium mineralization contained within the limits of the currently defined uranium resource. Management believes the uranium resource sits within the boundaries of a much larger vanadium deposit. The Company will plan a drill program to test the outer boundaries of the vanadium deposit in 2009.
"Not only have we now shown continuity of the deposit by upgrading a substantial portion of the resource from inferred to indicated, but we have also increased the overall number of pounds and delineated resources in two new areas," says Paul Hosford, President and COO of Crosshair. "With the added vanadium component of the deposit and the recent acquisition of the Two Time Zone, which also contains a NI 43-101 compliant uranium resource, we are well positioned to commence an expansion program on all four deposits."
The C Zone is divided into two distinct mineralized systems, the Upper C Zone and the Lower C Zone. At this point, no economic evaluations have been done on the project and as a result, a wide variety of U3O8 cut-off grades are presented. For the Upper C Zone, Armstrong and Area 1 resource estimates, a 0.015% U3O8 cut-off is considered appropriate for the location and cost profile that can be expected for open pit mining in Labrador, while the 0.035% U3O8 cut-off used for the Lower C Zone estimate is considered appropriate for an underground operation. These cut-offs were used to report the mineral resources stated above.
Upper C Zone
The Upper C Zone, which hosts polymetallic structurally controlled mineralization, is the most advanced uranium target on the property and has been intersected along strike for 1300 metres (m) and 420 m down dip and remains open in all directions.
INDICATED RESOURCE - UPPER C ZONE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tonnes Greater Grade Greater
U3O8 Cutoff Than Cutoff Than Cutoff Contained Million lbs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(%) (tonnes) U3O8 (%) V2O5 (%) U3O8 V2O5
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0.010 10,420,000 0.027 0.073 6.16 16.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0.015 6,920,000 0.034 0.077 5.13 11.71
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0.020 4,730,000 0.041 0.080 4.31 8.32
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0.030 2,370,000 0.057 0.085 2.98 4.44
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0.040 1,390,000 0.073 0.086 2.24 2.63
0.050 940,000 0.086 0.085 1.79 1.75
----------------------------------------------------------------------
INFERRED RESOURCE - UPPER C ZONE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tonnes Greater Grade Greater
U3O8 Cutoff Than Cutoff Than Cutoff Contained Million lbs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(%) (tonnes) U3O8 (%) V2O5 (%) U3O8 V2O5
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0.010 8,390,000 0.020 0.086 3.67 15.9
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0.015 5,320,000 0.024 0.100 2.84 11.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0.020 3,570,000 0.027 0.107 2.14 8.44
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0.030 410,000 0.042 0.110 0.38 1.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0.040 170,000 0.053 0.122 0.19 0.46
0.050 71,400 0.062 0.129 0.10 0.21
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- Getting the global view: Nestle, led by Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, climbs to the #1 spot in this year's Best Companies for Leaders


