Business process re-engineering in the small firm: A case study
INFOR, Feb 1996 by Hale, Andrea J, Cragg, Paul B
* Redesign of the chosen processes
The major reengineering effort involved the development of teams and alteration of each individual's tasks to ensure clarity of job descriptions, efficiency, and coherence with every other individual's tasks. The chosen tasks affected the whole business in each division and while the processes were not physically documented, each was considered in detail, clarified and analysed for inefficiencies.
* Initiate change
More Articles of Interest
- Cases on information technology and business process reengineering
- Simulation of Business Re-Engineering Processes: Case Study of a United...
- Business process reengineering: Putting theory into practice
- What is precision air conditioning and why is it necessary?
- 3G: naughty or nice? PhoneErotica.com generates over 300 million hits per...
No change was implemented without agreement from everybody. All the employees participated in the changes and had power to design the way they wanted their tasks to work. Employees were given responsibility for their own tasks and it was up to them to perform. Additionally, the business plan was documented and hung in reception for all to see. This outlined the tasks involved in completing each change and each of these tasks had owners who had to complete their tasks by the agreed due dates.
Considerable support was exhibited by senior management. They knew the details of the changes, and also indicated that they supported the changes wholeheartedly. Their attitude towards employees also emphasised the importance of the people to the business. The divisions were employing more people after each round of change, rather than removing people. This had been one of staff's major concerns and trust in management was strengthened from the promises and assurances which were actually delivered.
It took two attempts to implement satisfactory change at the Electronics division. Morale among staff was low to begin with, as it had been acquired by the firm from receivership and the employees resisted change from the outset. The changes had to be reinforced by the general manager from the Manufacturing division where the reengineering had been considerably more successful. The second attempt gained significantly higher acceptance and this appears to be due largely to the consistent support of management available to the employees.
* Implementation
Implementation was a major task to ensure that all the plans actually came to fruition. The timetables that were agreed upon by each member of the company were adhered to. The general manager was able to ensure this as all parties had agreed to the conditions, requirements and timetable. Further changes are still being planned and implemented.
* Evaluation
A customer survey was conducted both before and after the major changes, as the emphasis on outputs extended to the customer. This was partly in order to evaluate the success of their aims to improve outputs and focus on service. The survey will be repeated to determine the success of the changes that have occurred. Furthermore, the high level of adherence to the agreed timetables was another indication of the permanence and cooperation with the project as a whole.
6.1 Project Success
The success of the project exceeded the expectations of the managing director. After a slow start with the teambuilding, the role restructuring proved to be much better. The teams are very enthusiastic, with management offering considerable support. The divisions are performing better in service, customer relations and also employee relations. The focus on outputs has meant that the teams are more aware of the results of their work, and they have incentives that are related to those outputs.
BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic
Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS
-
1
rayees_cool
RE: Business process re-engineering in the small firm: A case ...
hi
to the author
i am not able to view tables and figures drawn of this article for eg: the basic mgt structure, table 1., table 2 , etc
please help me with these tables as they will make my job done effectively.
Thanks and regards
ray
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Technology Articles
Most Recent Technology Publications
Most Popular Technology Articles
- BizRate to monitor in-store customer satisfaction for Office Depot stores - Market Intelligence
- Speed control of separately excited DC motor
- Effects of creative, educational drama activities on developing oral skills in primary school children
- Political stability and economic growth in Asia
- Failed businesses in Japan: a study of how different companies have failed, and tips on how to succeed, in the Japanese market




