Successful students' perceptions of secondary school science
School Science and Mathematics, Mar 1997 by John Eichinger
Method
The sample consisted of 201 students from two highly selective undergraduate institutions (two of the six Claremont Colleges, located in Claremont, California: Harvey Mudd College and Pomona College, respectively abbreviated HMC and PC). One of the colleges (HMC) specializes in the sciences and related fields, and the other (PC) is a liberal arts institution offering a variety of majors, including science. One hundred fourteen subjects were science majors (i.e., majoring in, or planning to major in any of the natural sciences, engineering, or mathematics; abbreviated SM), and 87 subjects were nonscience majors (i.e., majoring in, or planning to major in, any other field of study; abbreviated NSM). Because of the scientific specialization of HMC, SMs were drawn from both colleges (80 from HMC and 34 from PC), whereas NSMs were drawn only from PC. Subjects ranged in age from 16 to 21 years, with a mean of 18.4 years. The most frequently encountered class level was first year (n = 120), followed by sophomores (n = 45), juniors (n = 34), and seniors (n = 1). (One class level response was left blank.) The sample included 110 male subjects (SM = 80) and 91 female subjects (SM = 30).
The academic success of the participants is demonstrated by the following: (1) the extremely selective admission processes at their colleges; (2) 182 (90.5%) reported maintaining an "A" level grade-point average in high school; (3) 186 (92.5%) reported graduating in the top quartile of their high school class; (4) the mean Scholastic Aptitude Test score for the sample was 1320, with a standard deviation of 112.1; and (5) although college grade-point averages were not yet available for the many lst-year students, 95% of the older subjects reported "A" or "B" averages.
The questionnaire was developed by the investigator and in its entirety consisted of 90 items, with many of the items requesting responses for both the junior high school (JHS) and high school (HS) levels. Thus, the survey generated data on 206 closed-format variables and on one final, in-depth, open-ended item (copies of the survey questions are available from the author). Development of the questionnaire was based upon an extensive review of pertinent literature, related surveys (National Assessment of Educational Progress,1978; Yager & Penick,1986), discourse with colleagues and students, personal experience, a pretest (Kidder & Judd, 1986), and a pilot study (Eichinger, 1992). Retrospective studies have been successfully conducted by previous investigators (Bloom, 1985; Yager & Bonnstetter, 1984; Yager & Penick, 1986), and in this study the potentially deleterious effects of faulty memory were mitigated by the young ages of the subjects and the self-selecting method of survey distribution. In addition, analysis revealed few significant differences between the responses of the various classes (1 st-year through senior).
The survey was distributed during the fall semester of 1989 on a self-selecting basis through lst-year rhetoric courses at HMC and campus mail at PC (venues recommended by the two college administrations). Follow-up requests were made on both campuses, yielding acombined return rate of 70%. Questions of generalizability arising from the nonrandom nature of the survey methodology are offset by the respectable sample size and return rate (Ary, Jacobs, & Razavieh, 1972).
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Reference Articles
- A Maryland state trooper gave Erik Bonstrom an $80 ticket for driving too slowly
- In California, postal worker Dean Hudson has been found guilty
- Alec Loorz, the 15-year-old founder of Kids vs. Global Warming and recent Brower Youth Award recipient, went to Congress in November for a press conference with Senators Barbara Boxer and John Kerry, who are championing legislation to stabilize US greenho
- Foreign exchange
- The buzz on bees
Most Recent Reference Publications
Most Popular Reference Articles
- Credit card debt on college campuses: causes, consequences, and solutions
- 9 questions to ask your new lover: what you were afraid to ask, but always wanted to know
- A world without nuclear weapons?
- How Tyler Perry rose from homelessness to a $5 million mansion
- Rejoice anyway - Zephaniah 3:14-20, Philippians 4:4-7 - Living by the Word - Column


