Experiential and Informational Knowledge, Architectural Marketing Capabilities, and the Adaptive Performance of Export Ventures: A Cross-National Study
Decision Sciences, Spring 2003 by Morgan, Neil A, Zou, Shaoming, Vorhies, Douglas W, Katsikeas, Constantine S
ABSTRACT
Knowledge-based view (KBV) theory posits that the acquisition and use of relevant knowledge is key to understanding organizational performance. However, there is relatively little empirical evidence to support or refute several important propositions underlying KBV theory explanations of organizational performance. In particular, the extant literature has focused on individual technical and scientific components of the knowledge bases of firms in dynamic industries, and largely ignored both different levels of informational and experiential knowledge relevant to the market environment, and the increasingly important context of exporting. Our study addresses these knowledge gaps by developing a framework for export venture knowledge management and empirically examining relationships between different types of individual-level and organizational-level knowledge relevant to the market environment, architectural marketing capabilities, and the adaptive performance of export ventures. Using primary data collected in the United Kingdom and China, our study indicates that export ventures' organizational-level experiential and informational knowledge, and individual-level experiential knowledge relevant to the market environment, is positively associated with export ventures' architectural marketing capabilities, which are in turn associated with the adaptive performance of export ventures.
Subject Areas: Causal Models, Globalization, Knowledge-Based Systems, Organizational Theory, Planning/Strategy, Survey Research/Design.
INTRODUCTION
Two fundamental questions in the study of organizations are "Why do firms exist?" and "Why do some firms perform better than others?" (e.g., Conner, 1991; Helfat & Raubitschek, 2000). Over the past decade, a new school of thought addressing both of these questions labeled the "knowledge-based view of the firm" (KBV) has emerged (e.g., Conner & Prahalad, 1996; Gupta & Govindarajan, 2000). The KBV posits that firms exist as social communities of knowledge (e.g., Demsetz, 1991; Kogut & Zander, 1996), with knowledge forming the most strategically significant firm resource, and heterogeneity in knowledge resources explaining interfirm performance variations (e.g., Grant, 1996b; Kogut & Zander, 1992). The KBV has generated significant scholarly interest across a large number of disciplines including organization theory, decision sciences, strategic management, management information system (MIS), operations, marketing, and international business (e.g., Basu, 1998; Earl, 2001; Hult, 1998; Inkpen & Dinur, 1998; Sinkula, 1994; Spender, 1996). Managers have also shown considerable interest in KBV theory, resulting in the creation of knowledge management functions in many organizations and knowledge management services becoming a significant source of revenue for consulting firms.
However, despite this widespread scholarly and managerial interest, understanding of the KBV theory on which knowledge management practice is based is limited by three characteristics of the existing literature. First, while a fundamental KBV premise is that an organization's knowledge base, comprising different types of knowledge at different levels of the organization, is linked with business performance outcomes, there have been remarkably few direct attempts to empirically examine this proposition. While the literature reveals a number of studies examining relationships between individual types of knowledge at particular levels within organizations, such as corporate-level research and development (R&D) activity and patents, with performance outcomes (e.g., Henderson & Clark, 1990), there have been few, if any, studies that simultaneously examine multiple components of an organization's knowledge base. Since KBV theory explicitly views a firm's knowledge base as comprising different types of knowledge at different levels in the organization, this is an important gap in existing knowledge. Failing to empirically examine such a fundamental KBV proposition can lead to questions concerning the utility of KBV theory, and the validity of resulting knowledge management prescriptions.
Second, both theoretical and empirical research in the KBV literature has focused primarily on technology-intensive and dynamic industries such as semi-conductors, biotechnology, and pharmaceuticals. As a result, most studies have emphasized technical and R&D knowledge, largely ignoring knowledge relating to an organization's market environment (e.g., Lord & Ranft, 2000; Sinkula, 1994). Although the notion of external market information as an important resource has been addressed in the marketing literature (e.g., Jaworski & Kohli, 1993; Slater & Narver, 1994), this has not been integrated within a KBV theory framework to include different types and levels of market knowledge in an organization's knowledge base, and the use of this knowledge in the development and utilization of organizational capabilities that allow organizations to adapt to their environment.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- "Do not rely on a single economy" ; Larsen and Toubro (L and T) was affected due to the slowdown particularly the products businesses, which include switchgears, construction equipment and industrial bars.
- "The first deliberate call we took was not to lay off anybody" ; The diversified group decided to reskill all surplus workers.
- "Government had to step up its demand" ; The downturn affected the government as much as India Inc. The outgoing advisor to the Government of India details its impact and its lessons.
- "Help your customers even in difficult times" ; Oil was at an all-time high at over $135 per barrel just before the financial meltdown. Then oil crashed to a low of $35 per barrel in January this year, bringing down any fresh demand for pipes fr
- "You have to be visible as a leader" ; Transparency is a standard operating procedure for communications during a downturn.
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- Using object-oriented analysis and design over traditional structured analysis and design
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions



