Featured White Papers
- Enterprise PBX comparison guide (VoIP-News)
- Aug. 28th: Delivering Online Presentations That Result in Higher Sales (Citrix Online)
- 9 critical reasons to automate performance management (SuccessFactors, Inc.)
USE OF JUVENAL PLUMAGE IN DIAGNOSING SPECIES LIMITS: AN EXAMPLE USING BUNTINGS IN THE GENUS PLECTROPHENAX
Auk, The, Jul 2007 by Maley, James M, Winker, Kevin
Juvenal plumage is largely overlooked in systematic studies of closely related species. Because juvenal plumage is worn for such a brief time, and perhaps because collectors do not realize that this plumage is useful in systematic studies, specimens in this plumage tend to be rather rare in collections. Our results suggest that juvenal plumage can be useful for examining species limits, and an effort should be made to fill this collection gap. By analyzing this plumage between subspecies and putative species, we can obtain a relative scale for defining species limits using the associated informative characters. Quantifying these differences using spectrophotometry allows for rigorous statistical analyses of differences and potential biases. Analysis of juvenal plumage in other groups should also be considered useful in determining species limits, especially when adult plumage characters are only slightly different or equivocal between populations.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF OPP-9725154) and the University of Alaska Museum. We thank the staff of the U.S. National Museum for specimens loaned and the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge for logistical support and permits to work on St. Matthew Island. We also thank D. W. Shaw for taking photographs. Valuable comments were provided by R. T. Brumfield, D. D. Gibson, M. J. Lelevier, J. D. Maley, K. G. McCracken, M. J. Miller, L. E. Olson, C. L. Pruett, and an anonymous reviewer.
LITERATURE CITED
AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1957. Check-list of North American birds, 5th ed. American Ornithologists' Union, Baltimore, Maryland.
AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1983. Checklist of North American birds, 6th ed. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.
AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1998. Checklist of North American birds, 7th ed. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.
ARBIB, R. S. 1980. Third in Fuertes print series. American Birds 34:20-21.
BEAL, K. G., and H. J. KHAMIS. 1991. A problem in statistical analysis: Simultaneous inference. Condor 93:1023-1025.
BROWN, M. B., and A. B. FORSYTHE. 1974. Robust tests for the equality of variances. Journal of the American Statistics Association 69:364-367.
EISENMANN, E. 1965. The use of the terms "juvenal" and "juvenile." Auk 82:105.
FIGUEROLA, J., J. C. SENAR, AND J. PASCUAL. 1999. The use of a colorimeter in field studies of Blue Tit Parus caeruleus coloration. Ardea 87:269-275.
GABRIELSON, I. N., AND F. C. LINCOLN. 1951. Post-mortem color change in bird specimens. Condor 53:298-299.
GRABER, R. R. 1955. Taxonomic and adaptive features of the juvenal plumage in North American sparrows. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oklahoma, Norman.
GRAVES, G. R. 1997. Age determination of free-living male Black-throated Blue Warblers during the breeding season. Journal of Field Ornithology 68:443-449.
HILL, G. E. 1998. An easy, inexpensive means to quantify plumage coloration. Journal of Field Ornithology 69:353-363.