Indiana bankers may face deposit insurance premium
Northwestern Financial Review, Jun 1-Jun 14, 2003 by Dullum, Justin
Indiana bankers may have to pay premiums into the Public Deposit Insurance Fund following the passing of legislation that removes $50 million from the fund in the form of a loan. Previously, the fund was flush with $297 million - $15 million more than the $282 million level determined actuarially sound by an independent accounting firm in 1999. Banker groups fought the legislation saying the state has never contributed to the fund.
The legislature took the money as an interest-free loan to help compensate for an $850 million state budget deficit. The repayment schedule extends through 2014.
"Originally, the legislators wanted to take $50 million out and not pay it back," said Kerry Sprandlin of the Indiana Bankers Association's government relations department.
Bank lobbyists were also seeking language that would alleviate the banks' obligation to pay premiums to replenish the fund until the loan was paid off, but this measure was not successful.
The Public Deposit Insurance Fund protects the depositors of public funds. If a bank with public deposits fails, the PDIF covers the amount of those funds not covered by the FDIC.
"If a school board deposits money in an Indiana bank, the bank doesn't have to collateralize," said Sprandlin. "Municipalities get a higher rate of return on their investments because banks don't have to bear those costs. And banks get access to the funds. Everyone wins but unfortunately the insurance fund that allows this to happen has been compromised."
Sprandlin said it's unclear whether the board that governs the fund will assess a premium, which hasn't been done since the early 1980s.
Two years ago, the legislature took the interest earnings from the fund and diverted them to support police and fire pension obligations. "The fund has not been growing since then," said Sprandlin, who said one of the most upsetting things to bankers is that since the fund's interest is not fed back into the fund, it can't grow back on its own.
"It's a backdoor tax," said Sprandlin. "It's a rotten deal."
Indiana's PDIF was created in 1937. To date, the fund has paid out about $1.6 million, according to the state treasurer.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions
- Using object-oriented analysis and design over traditional structured analysis and design


