Content provided in partnership with
IOLTA: Crude leftist scheme to take our money
Human Events, Feb 6, 1998 by Feder, Don
High-Minded Thievery in Name of `the Poor'
IOLTA-an acronym for Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts-is practically unknown outside of legal circles. (Attorneys are encouraged to keep their clients in the dark about the program.) On January 13, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on its constitutionality.
IOLTA is another way the left uses government as a conduit to our wallets.
It started during the Reagan years. The coalition of activist lawyers who run the Legal Services Corporation worried that Reaganites would stop them from spending tax dollars to litigate for their pet political causes. They required a slush fund beyond the reach of voters to finance these operations. Enter IOLTA. Lawyers hold sums of money for their clients, usually for short periods. With the advent of NOW (Negotiable Order of Withdrawal) accounts, these funds began generating interest.
- Most Popular Articles in Reference
- The importance of understanding organizational culture
- Credit card attitudes and behaviors of college students
- What factors attract foreign direct investment?
- Libraries Need Relationship Marketing - mutual interest marketing concept, ...
- How to set performance goals: employee reviews are more than annual critiques
- More »
Under IOLTA (established by state courts or legislatures and now in operation in every state), lawyers are directed to periodically pay the earnings to foundations, which in turn make grants to groups that theoretically litigate for the poor.
As with Legal Services, under IOLTA, "poor" has developed an elastic definition that's stretched to cover lobbying for legislation thought to benefit the poor, like rent control, and issues not remotely related to poverty, like gay rights.
Nationwide, IOLTA generates $100 million a year. In 1991, the Boston Bar Foundation (a dispenser of IOLTA funds) explained: "IOLTA means that children will not become homeless, women and children will not be beaten, and elderly and disabled people will not be denied hard-earned Social Security benefits." Also, apple pies will bake, the streets will ring with the laughter of children and the American flag will fly above the land of the free.
Leftist Lawyers Have No Interest in Non-PC Causes
The reality of IOLTA is somewhat different. Because recipients aren't required to report their activities, much goes unnoticed. However, the following has been documented:
In 1992, when Boston ordered its St. Patrick Day's parade to accept a contingent of homosexual marchers, litigation ensued. The gays were represented by the Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, a recipient of IOLTA funding.
You will probably not go into coronary arrest on learning that the organizers, a veterans group, received no similar support. Represented pro bono by a sole practitioner, the veterans fought their way to the Supreme Court, which vindicated them.
In Washington state, Evergreen Legal Services successfully overturned a HUD regulation expediting the eviction of public housing tenants engaged in criminal activities. Apparently, law-abiding tenants aren't poor enough to merit its concern.
* Charles E. Rounds, Jr., a professor at Suffolk University Law School, tells the story of a Boston secretary earning $23,000 a year who bought a condominium that was occupied by an attorney. When the impoverished lawyer refused to vacate, she sought aid from several IOLTA recipients, who turned her away. One said it would never represent a "landlord." Rounds comments: "IOLTA is more about poverty politics than representing the poor. The politically incorrect need not apply."
On January 13, the Washington Legal Foundation argued that IOLTA represents a taking of private property (interest on a clients' money) for public purposes without compensation, prohibited by the 5th Amendment. With advanced computer programs, interest in lawyers' trust accounts can be subaccounted to individual clients down to the last penny.
The left are like roaches in ceaseless pursuit of our money. Chase them here (compulsory union dues, Legal Services appropriations, National Endowment for the Arts funding) and they pop up there.
Late last December, the mayor of Darby, Pa., was arrested for robbing a local bank. Unlike IOLTA, Daniel F. Devlin did it the old-fashioned way.
Mr. Feder, who writes for the Boston Herald, is a nationally syndicated columnist and author of Who's Afraid of the Religious Right?
Copyright Human Events Publishing, Inc. Feb 6, 1998
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved
Find Research Guides for:
Most Popular Articles in Reference
- The importance of understanding organizational culture
- Credit card attitudes and behaviors of college students
- What factors attract foreign direct investment?
- Libraries Need Relationship Marketing - mutual interest marketing concept, ...
- How to set performance goals: employee reviews are more than annual critiques
- More »