Find Articles in:
All
Business
Reference
Technology
News
Lifestyle

Senate barely confirms Olson solicitor general

Human Events, Jun 4, 2001

On May 24, by a 51-to-47 vote, the Senate confirmed the nomination of Ted Olson to be solicitor general of the United States. Olson, who had strong support from conservatives, is most noted for successfully arguing the Republican side in Bush v. Gore before the U.S. Supreme Court last winter. The solicitor general represents the United States is cases before the Supreme Court.

Due to partisan opposition in the Judiciary Committee that resulted in a 9-to-9 vote on Olson's nomination May 17, Sen. Trent Lott was forced to invoke his new (and now fleeting) power to discharge a nomination or measure onto the Senate floor.

Although he was supported by numerous liberal legal experts, Senate Democrats first attacked Olson, who was nominated back in February, for his role in investigative reporting by the American Spectator into Bill Clinton's corruption in Arkansas. Then they opposed him because they claimed that his committee testimony on the matter was false (see HUMAN EVENTs last week, pages 6, 7).

Shortly after Sen. Jim Jeffords (Vt.) announced he would leave the Republican Party, Lott was able to bring the nomination to a vote. Forty-nine Republicans and two Democrats-Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Zell Miller of Georgia-voted yes. Jeffords, who was still in Vermont at the time, did not vote.

Sen. Russ Feingold (D.-Wis.), who had supported other controversial Bush nominees such as John Ashcroft and John Bolton, opposed Olson. Feingold said: "Mr. Olson testified that the solicitor general owes the Supreme Court `absolute candor and fair dealing: I think that nominees owe Senate committees that same duty when they testify at nominations hearings. I do not think that Mr. Olson met that standard."

Senate Democrats did not oppose Lott's discharge motion, allowing it pass by unanimous consent. The rollcall vote was on the actual confirmation.

A "yes" vote was a vote to confirm Ted Olson. to be solicitor general of the United States. A "no" vote was a vote against Olson.

FOR CONFIRMATION (51)

REPUBLICANS FOR (49): Allard, Allen, Bennett, Bond, Brownback, Bunning, Bums, Campbell, Chafee, Cochran, Collins, Craig, Crapo, DeWine, Domenici, Ensign, Enzi, Fitzgerald, Frist, Gramm (Tex.), Grassley, Gregg, Hagel, Hatch, Helms, Hutchinson (Ark.), Hutchison (Tex.), Inhofe, Kyl, Lott, Lugar, McCain, McConnell, Murkowski, Nickles, Roberts, Santorum, Sessions, Shelby, Smith (N.H.), Smith (Ore.), Snowe, Specter, Stevens, Thomas, Thompson, Thurmond, Voinovich and Warner.

DEMOCRATS FOR (2): Miller and Nelson (Neb.).

AGAINST CONFIRMATION (47)

DEMOCRATS AGAINST (47): Akaka, Baucus, Bayh, Biden, Bingaman, Boxer, Breaux, Byrd, Cantwell, Carnahan, Career, Cleland, Clinton, Conrad, Corzine, Daschle, Dayton, Dodd, Dorgan, Durbin, Edwards, Feingold, Feinstein, Graham (Fla.), Harkin, Hollings, Inouye, Johnson, Kennedy, Kerry, Kohl, Landrieu, Leahy, Levin, Lieberman, Lincoln, Mikulski, Murray, Nelson (Fla.), Reed (R.1.), Reid (Nev.), Sarbanes, Schumer, Stabenow, Torricelli, Wellstone and Wyden.

NOT VOTING (2): Jeffords** and Rockefeller.

Copyright Human Events Publishing, Inc. Jun 4, 2001
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved
 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

The following tags are supported in BNET comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. You are currently a guest | Login?
advertisement
Go
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement