Resources: FOCUS: Assuring quality in distance learning

Presidency, The, Fall 2000 by Eaton, Judith S

Presidents, chancellors, other college and university administrators, and trustees are called upon every day to make effective and immediate decisions about distance learning. These decisions are supposed to result in shrewd investment in hardware and software, substantive assistance to faculty as they develop online teaching skills, thoughtful policies for future determination of intellectual property rights, and meeting students' technology needs with laptop computers and wired dormitories.

Obtaining reliable information on which to base these distance learning decisions, however, is a daunting task. Prior experience with site-based institutions, no matter how valuable, is no longer an adequate guide for presidents and other leaders. Distance learning decisions are made in an unfamiliar context: the potential of online enrollment, emerging new providers, the growing for-profit presence in higher education, renewed federal and state interest in regulation of higher education, and more and more questions about international distance learning. The scope, variation, and amount of information on these issues can be truly staggering.

Influencing all the decisions that presidents make about distance learning is a strong and steady desire to assure quality. Our willingness to take advantage of distance learning capacity is, in many ways, shaped by our confidence that we can continue to sustain and enhance this longstanding commitment.

In the fluid and sometimes volatile environment created by distance learning, we at the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA)-the national coordinating body for national, regional, and specialized accreditation-struggle to bring some order to the avalanche of information about both distance learning and quality assurance. What is an effective strategy for inquiry? How do we develop a framework for strategic understanding of distance learning? How do we assist our member colleges and universities with the right questions about quality?

Strategy for Inquiry

At CHEA, we track a limited number of important distance learning indicators: enrollments (numbers and locations of students enrolled), new providers (those offering distance learning outside traditional institutions), and quality review (how accreditors and other external reviewers assure quality in distance learning). There are other issues to which we also pay some attention-the role of faculty is one example-and we know that additional areas will become more important in the future.

Dividing distance learning into these more manageable areas of inquiry enables us temporarily to ignore material that, however valuable, is not germane to a particular inquiry at a particular time. For example, when we need information about quality teaching and learning in an online setting, material on hardware purchase is irrelevant.

In CHEA's inquiry into distance learning, we have found that some information just a few years old is already out of date. For this reason, we rely heavily on online sources, which are easier to update. We have found that some of the most reliable information about distance learning often is generated not by the higher education community, but, for example, by business or government. We pay particular attention to periodical literature, whether in print or online. We regularly check useful web sites and subscribe to listservs that are rich with information.

Framework for Understanding

How do we find out about distance learning enrollments and what other colleges and universities are doing? The U.S. Department of Education's Distance Education at Postsecondary Institutions 199798 (//nces.ed.gov) is one important source for enrollment information. Another is Peterson's Guide to Distance Learning Programs 2000. The Chronicle of Higher Education (//chronicle.com/distance) provides extensive coverage of distance learning. Corporate reports such as Merrill Lynch's The Knowledge Web (May 2000; contact michael-moe@ml.com) and Credit Suisse/First Boston's Education Industry Quarterly Report Card (January 2000; contact greg.cappelli@csfb.com) publish regular enrollment updates and projections.

To satisfy growing distance learning enrollments, site-based institutions are creating exciting new models of teaching and learning. The University of Maryland University College (//umuc.edu) enrolls 40,000 students online and the University of Phoenix Online (//online.uophx.edu) enrolls approximately 12,000 students. The University of Illinois site (www.uillinois.edu/uionline) and the University of WisconsinMadison site (//uwmad.courses. wisc.edu), as well as its distance education clearinghouse (//uwex. edu/disted/home.html), are also valuable sources of information.

Who are the new distance-based providers of higher education? "New providers," those who deliver distance learning outside traditional site-based institutions, are increasingly important in considerations of quality. There is much to be gained from visiting the web sites of virtual universities such as Western Governors University (www.wgu.edu), Jones International University (www. jonesinternational.edu), and United States Open University (www.open.edu). Other new providers include consortia such as the Southern Regional Electronic Campus (www.srec.sreb.org) and UNext's Cardean University (www.cardean.com). Corporate universities and corporate information technology certification programs are considered new providers as well (see Cliff Adelman's "A Parallel Universe," Change, May/June 2000). New providers also include those offering online courses and programs that are not affiliated with any institution.