State-court tort action by seaman against shipowner can proceed if defendant's right to limited liability is protected
Law Reporter, Jun 2001
Cammon v. City of New York, 95 N.Y.2d 583 (2000).
The New York Court of Appeals held that federal maritime law does not necessarily preempt state labor law in a personal injury case.
Here, a foreman dock builder was injured while working at a marine transfer station. He sued a general contractor and the station's municipal owner-operator in state court, alleging violations of state labor law. The trial court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment on the ground that federal maritime law applies to the incident and preempts state labor law.
An intermediate appellate court reversed this decision and reinstated the complaint. Defendants appealed, contending that since the state law imposes strict liability while maritime law requires actual proof of negligence, imposing state standards where admiralty jurisdiction exists would disrupt the uniformity of federal maritime law.
Affirming, the state high court observed that protection of workers engaged in maritime activities is one of the objectives of federal maritime law. State application of strict liability here will not unduly interfere with the federal interest in maintaining the free flow of maritime commerce, the court reasoned, as local regulations that govern only liability issues with respect to landowners and contractors within a state have no extraterritorial effect. If a tort is maritime but local and carries no far-reaching implications for vessels or seafarers, application of local law poses no threat to the uniformity of federal maritime law, the court said.
Also, the concept of strict liability is not necessarily antithetical to federal maritime law, the court found. For example, the doctrine of seaworthiness imposes an absolute and nondelegable duty on vessel owners. The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized the importance of state police powers to protect the health and safety of its citizens and has authorized the application of state strict liability statutes in admiralty cases, the court noted.
Plaintiff's Counsel
*Paul T. Hofmann, New York, N.Y.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Reference Articles
Most Recent Reference Publications
Most Popular Reference Articles
- A world without nuclear weapons?
- 9 questions to ask your new lover: what you were afraid to ask, but always wanted to know
- How Tyler Perry rose from homelessness to a $5 million mansion
- Rejoice anyway - Zephaniah 3:14-20, Philippians 4:4-7 - Living by the Word - Column
- Medical education's dirtiest secret - use of medical residents



