Woman trips over carpet roll in store: Creation of dangerous condition: Fractured shoulder: Verdict

Law Reporter, Dec 2004

Piper v. Home Depot USA, Inc., Ariz., Maricopa County Super. Ct., No. CV2003-011353, Sept. 14, 2004.

Piper, 77, was shopping in a store when she tripped over a caipet roll that extended 12 to 18 inches into die store's aisle. Piper fell to the floor, fracturing her right shoulder. Her past medical expenses were approximately $15,000, and she has required about $37,600 in home care expenses as a result of the incident.

Piper sued die store, alleging it created a dangerous condition by leaving the carpet there. Plaintiff argued in the alternative that the store had constructive notice of the dangerous condition, or improperly operated the store in a way that caused plaintiff's injury. A retiree, Piper did not claim lost income.

Defendant denied the allegations and contended the carpet roll was an open and obvious condition.

A jury found defendant 85 percent at fault and plaintiff 15 percent liable. It awarded plaintiff $250,000, which was reduced to $212,500 to reflect the finding of comparative fault.

Plaintiff's expert was William Brainard, orthopedics, Litchfield Park, Ariz.

Defendant's expert was Ronald M. Lampert, orthopedics, Phoenix, Ariz.

Plaintiff's Counsel

*Lewis B. Moore III, Phoenix, Ariz.

Copyright Association of Trial Lawyers of America Dec 2004
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved
 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with ProQuest