Underrepresentation of minority students in gifted and talented education
Multicultural Education, Fall 2003 by Anguiano, Lidia T
Legal Considerations
So why is there such a concern about minorities in gifted and talented education? Appropriate testing and implementation of gifted and talented programs is not a choice but rather a right. Due to the fact that gifted and talented education is special education, there are specific legal considerations and mandates governing the assessment and implementation of services.
According to Diana vs. State Board of Education (1973), assessment must be carried out in the student's primary language. Therefore, the collection of supportive data must document the appropriateness of special education placement of a student. In addition, Lau vs. Nichols (1974) provides for primary language programs to ensure equal education opportunities for students with special needs. Finally, the 1995 Public Law 93-380 Equal Education Amendment of 1974 stipulates that testing must be conducted in a nondiscriminatory manner (Bullock, 1992).
More Articles of Interest
- Identifying gifted students from underrepresented populations
- Desegregating gifted education: A need unmet
- Identification concerns and promises for gifted students of diverse populations
- Underachievement among gifted students of color: implications for educators
- Teacher Judgment in Identifying Gifted/Talented Students
Recommendations/Conclusion
Gifted and talented education helps all students because the high-achieving students positively impact other students by motivating and raising standards (Oakes, 1985). Too often there is a great deal of misinformation which puts students at a disadvantage. It is important for educators and parents to become more knowledgeable about the various mandates and services available to students based on their needs and exceptionalities.
Social barriers should be eliminated so that the concepts of school and education are no longer thought of as a bureaucracy controlled by educated Whites whom minorities have no right to question. (Nicolau et al, 1990). It would be a great loss to misidentify a gifted and talented student, leaving him or her in a world of boredom and underachievement (Koopman-Dayton & Feldhusen, 1987).
Testing as we know it should only be one part of the criteria utilized to identify and place students needing G.T. services. The process for identifying students should take into account the population being tested to ensure that assessment is connected directly to what the gifted and talented education program will focus on.
As the number of ethnic minority students continues to grow at a rapid rate in the United States, student diversity needs to be viewed in a positive light, as an asset. We also need to connect the school and community (Minicucci et al, 1995) so that students and parents do not feel alienated. It is important to keep in mind that parents and teachers have one common goal, to ensure that every student reaches his or her academic and social potential. Accessibility to special programs such as gifted and talented education is a worthwhile investment.
Shedding light on issues such as the underrepresentation of minority students in gifted and talented education allows us to understand why this is taking place. Not only do we need to use different tools and assessments; not only do we need to use different assessments; we also need different eyes to measure the strengths of all students (Plummer). Most importantly, this allows us to make positive changes for the benefit of all students. We cannot allow students to be denied the opportunity to receive the highest quality education available. As Steven Covey (The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People) put it, "Giving Wings to our children and to others means empowering them with the freedom to rise above negative scripting that had been passed down to us." (Covey, 1990).
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Reference Articles
- A Maryland state trooper gave Erik Bonstrom an $80 ticket for driving too slowly
- In California, postal worker Dean Hudson has been found guilty
- Alec Loorz, the 15-year-old founder of Kids vs. Global Warming and recent Brower Youth Award recipient, went to Congress in November for a press conference with Senators Barbara Boxer and John Kerry, who are championing legislation to stabilize US greenho
- Foreign exchange
- The buzz on bees
Most Recent Reference Publications
Most Popular Reference Articles
- Credit card debt on college campuses: causes, consequences, and solutions
- 9 questions to ask your new lover: what you were afraid to ask, but always wanted to know
- How Tyler Perry rose from homelessness to a $5 million mansion
- Rejoice anyway - Zephaniah 3:14-20, Philippians 4:4-7 - Living by the Word - Column
- Living by the word



